A lot of liberals today are saying that they're totally against the Afghan campaign. They say peace is the answer and that going around and killing innocent people isn't a good idea just because we got attacked. The blame the government for attacking Afghanistan. I do believe that peace is the answer-that retaliating won't solve anything. But we're taking out potential threats towards our nation, and I think it's worth it. We're not going around killing innocent people. In fact, we're helping Afghanistan. We're freeing them from a tyrannical government and setting up one completely set by the people. And also, I hate it when they blame it on the government. After Sept. 11, when the people saw that many Afghanis and other arbs and terrorists supported these attacks and cheered them on, they were hellbent for war. The whole country was screaming for it, and the government gave them what they want. And now they blame the government for doing it and now they're saying peace is the answer when they started it. Sometimes I'm frustarated with the short-mindedness of Americans.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Something about liberals really angers me
Collapse
X
-
Something about liberals really angers me
"The first man who, having fenced off a plot of land, thought of saying, 'This is mine' and found people simple enough to believe him was the real founder of civil society. How many crimes, wars, murders, how many miseries and horrors might the human race had been spared by the one who, upon pulling up the stakes or filling in the ditch, had shouted to his fellow men: 'Beware of listening to this imposter; you are lost if you forget the fruits of the earth belong to all and that the earth belongs to no one." - Jean-Jacques RousseauTags: None
-
We're freeing them from a tyrannical government
and setting up one completely set by the people.
But it certainly was not chosen simply by "Just the People" of Afghan.
-
And certainly saying that this is "something about liberals" isn't really true. You're saying that some people are totally against the war, but that's not a cornerstone of any kind of liberal policy. It's just from a vocal group either trying to do some rabble rousing for political power, or those who aren't in line with the rest of Party thought at this time.Dom Pedro II - 2nd and last Emperor of the Empire of Brazil (1831 - 1889).
I truly believe that America is the world's second chance. I only hope we get a third...
Comment
-
Many people feel that armed conflict is a no-no in almost all cases.
Have they lost the nerve? I don't know, but I can't agree that that would be a good policy to follow in this world at this time.(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
Comment
-
But we're taking out potential threats towards our nation, and I think it's worth it. We're not going around killing innocent people."Chegitz, still angry about the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991?
You provide no source. You PROVIDE NOTHING! And yet you want to destroy capitalism.. you criminal..." - Fez
"I was hoping for a Communist utopia that would last forever." - Imran Siddiqui
Comment
-
Re: Something about liberals really angers me
Originally posted by johncmcleod
But we're taking out potential threats towards our nation, and I think it's worth it. We're not going around killing innocent people.
It's fair to say the US government tried to minimize civilian casualties and that the use of high tech weapons for the most part achieved the objective of minimizing these deaths, but to say that the US has not killed any innocent people is completely false.
Many people objected to the American invasion of Afghanistan because it was a questionable method of achieving the desired objective of capturing Osama, such as pressuring the Taliban to turn him over to the US.
Would a diplomatic strategy have worked? We'll never know. Did invading Afghanistan work? Only time will tell.Golfing since 67
Comment
-
Re: Re: Something about liberals really angers me
Originally posted by Tingkai
Many people objected to the American invasion of Afghanistan because it was a questionable method of achieving the desired objective of capturing Osama, such as pressuring the Taliban to turn him over to the US.
Demonstrating to governments everywhere that your country could be taken apart if you harbour terrorists was part of the programme.(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
Comment
-
Originally posted by notyoueither
There will never be a war without some dead innocents.
It ain't gonna happen."Chegitz, still angry about the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991?
You provide no source. You PROVIDE NOTHING! And yet you want to destroy capitalism.. you criminal..." - Fez
"I was hoping for a Communist utopia that would last forever." - Imran Siddiqui
Comment
-
i'm talking about Afghanistan...our goal was not to declare war on a country, but to surgically remove a few chioce 'leaders'
We failed to do our job correctly on several occasions. We're making the same mistakes we made throughout the 70s and 80s."Chegitz, still angry about the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991?
You provide no source. You PROVIDE NOTHING! And yet you want to destroy capitalism.. you criminal..." - Fez
"I was hoping for a Communist utopia that would last forever." - Imran Siddiqui
Comment
-
Re: Re: Re: Something about liberals really angers me
Originally posted by notyoueither
Capturing Osama was not the only objective.
Demonstrating to governments everywhere that your country could be taken apart if you harbour terrorists was part of the programme.
Getting Osama was the prime objective.Golfing since 67
Comment
Comment