Originally posted by Ethelred
No your going to use an incorrect definition because you are stubborn.
No your going to use an incorrect definition because you are stubborn.

I've got no real problem with people using the term "agnostic" as a dual metaphysical/epistemological definition, it's just that it seems odd for an agnostic to insist that he/she isn't an atheist. Sure, weak atheists don't want to be lumped in with the hard-core strong atheists, but all the same you don't see the Christians demanding that there be separate categories for "moderate/liberal, non-wacko Christians" and "fundamentalist nutball Christians."
Besides, I've always preferred "secular humanist" over "agnostic," since it's got more of a tax-free sound to it.
Comment