Regime change

[Zulu Elephant]

The otherthrow of which leader to do you think would contribute most to world security/prosperity/peace etc.


Disclaimer:
This is a genuine attempt to gauge opinion - No offense is meant to either the American of Iraqi people

[Ned]

If one listens to the Kurd leader speak on the topic of Bush and America, you know how the oppressed peoples of Iraqi would vote.

Liberate Iraq!

[Kepler]

I really wanted to vote for "The Top Banana."

[Giancarlo]

Iraq needs to be liberated. It would be very sad and dispressing to see even one vote for GWB...

[alofatti]

Perhaps both of them should be removed...
But not exactly "overthrown", maybe a more democratic way of handling things is in order.

The way the world is going on now is not exactly good and I don´t think that with Bush things will improve...

[spartak]

6 each - about right.

[Joe R. Golowka]

We definately need a regime change here in America. The dictator Bush, who used fraud in to steal the last election away from a moron, has repeatedly violated American's civil liberties, used chemical weapons on his own people, has a huge arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and has threatened numerous other countries with aggression.

[TheStinger]

Originally posted by Joe R. Golowka
We definately need a regime change here in America. The dictator Bush, who used fraud in to steal the last election away from a moron, has repeatedly violated American's civil liberties, used chemical weapons on his own people, has a huge arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and has threatened numerous other countries with aggression.

and he hasn't got a moustache

[spartak]

10 vs 10.

Cool.

Hey Joe - Coooool It! Bush is a moron and quite capable of destroying the world with his stupidity. Saddam is a monster but not exactly threatening the world right now. Choice is simple....

[Q Classic]

bush is in the lead now!

anyway, to be serious, i don't think disposing of either of them would lead to more stability. the ones i think need to go are sharon, and all the leaders of the palestinian terrorist cells.

[Zoid]

Hmm, one homocidal maniac against another, tough choice... But since Saddam isn´t threatening world peace right now it´s gotta be Bush.

[axi]

It took me less than one second to vote in that poll. The answer is so obvious...

[tniem]

The thing is that while Bush's removal would do more for world peace than Saddam, if he is removed that would collapse the American democracy thus hurting the stability and peace of the world. So I would have to say that while I would like to see Bush go, please wait till 2004.

[Ned]

Originally posted by Joe R. Golowka
We definately need a regime change here in America. The dictator Bush, who used fraud in to steal the last election away from a moron, has repeatedly violated American's civil liberties, used chemical weapons on his own people, has a huge arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and has threatened numerous other countries with aggression.

All I can say to a moronic statement such as this is F U.

[loinburger]

Bush's impeachment and removal from office might lead to more improvements in stability/peace/etc. than Saddam's exile/death/whatever, simply because the US has more global influence than Iraq. However, "overthrowing" Bush would probably be disastrous, as it would most likely plunge the US into anarchy. Sorry, but anarchy in a nuclear power is never a good thing.