Genghis Khan definitely- he took a group of plains barbarians and created a great empie.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who is the greatest military leader of all-time?
Collapse
X
-
Lee and Patton.I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Comment
-
I have to say Patton, especially since he is the reincarnation of both Alexander the Great and Napoleon along with a few other great generals."Yay Apoc!!!!!!!" - bipolarbear
"At least there were some thoughts went into Apocalypse." - Urban Ranger
"Apocalype was a great game." - DrSpike
"In Apoc, I had one soldier who lasted through the entire game... was pretty cool. I like apoc for that reason, the soldiers are a bit more 'personal'." - General Ludd
Comment
-
Alexander the Great was obviously the best ever - military strategists still marvel over his achievements.
I have seen people here write that Alexander merely kicked in the door of a rotting Persian empire but if you study his campaigns and know anything about military tactics and generalship you'll find a bold decisive general who had a knack for summing up a situation and quickly making the right decisions on the battlefield - and also the right strategic decisions in his campaigns. He really was extraordinary - he won time and again against the odds and did things of which there is no equal. He also won in virtually every form of campaign from encounter battle to siege.
The big question mark over him in my mind is not so much the weakness of his enemy but the degree to which Alexander's legend was made by his army and his generals. He inherited a superb veteran fighting force from his father, which combined the best of Greek heavy infantry tradition with a legendary cavalry which made his Macedonians an unbeatable fighting force. We will never know however how much the strategic and battlefield decisions were the result of Alexander's genius or wise advice from a team of veteran generals. At the end of the day however it was Alexander who called the shots so the point is probably moot.
Aside from that he was also an evil destructive psychopath but that isn't the question hereAny views I may express here are personal and certainly do not in any way reflect the views of my employer. Tis the rising of the moon..
Look, I just don't anymore, okay?
Comment
-
Patton isn't really in the hunt for an acolade like this. He never rose above middle ranking commander and indeed never mastermnded any decisive battles either for that matter. Same with Rommel and a few of the other wannabes. Really small beer those guys, diletantes.
Lee? I'd argue Sherman was better. Lee might have done some nice things but Sherman was a winner and had a better strategic sense. His manouevres weren't as pretty but he was damned effective. In fact its usually losers who have to come up with the fancy footwork, to stave off the inevitable.
If you're looking for an American General in this league I'd look at Macarthur. An unfashionable view I know, but there it is.Any views I may express here are personal and certainly do not in any way reflect the views of my employer. Tis the rising of the moon..
Look, I just don't anymore, okay?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Troll
You are indeed correct, I also think you have a grasp of what we in this thread are looking for!!
Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
Patton isn't really in the hunt for an acolode like this. He never rose above midle ranking commander. Same with Rommel and a few of the other wannabes. Really small beer those guys, diletantes."Yay Apoc!!!!!!!" - bipolarbear
"At least there were some thoughts went into Apocalypse." - Urban Ranger
"Apocalype was a great game." - DrSpike
"In Apoc, I had one soldier who lasted through the entire game... was pretty cool. I like apoc for that reason, the soldiers are a bit more 'personal'." - General Ludd
Comment
-
I think Patton has a very overblown reputation. Not a great general, okay as an aggressive subordinate commander when kept under control but that's about it.
He was never allowed to show what he could do anyway.Any views I may express here are personal and certainly do not in any way reflect the views of my employer. Tis the rising of the moon..
Look, I just don't anymore, okay?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
I'd argue Sherman was better. Lee might have done some nice things but Sherman was a winner and had a better strategic sense.I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kamrat X
It´s a tie between Genghis Kahn and Alexander really, but I´ll vote for Alexander. I never liked Genghis...
I say with all I read, my vote would have to go for Alexander
I actually think this is more on course with what is being looked for here.Hi, I'm RAH and I'm a Benaholic.-rah
Comment
Comment