Iran

[orange]

you have the same possibility to destroy them that they do you, and you already have nukes

So what's the difference? Just because your state sponsored terrorism is 'democratic' and theirs isn't?

[Eli]

They have two kinds of leaders

Both radical.

You know... And majority of population stands against the fundamental ones...

Yeah, and what are they going to do? Vote the fundies out of their office?

Originally posted by Heresson
Anyway perhaps Israel can be endangered. But i don't mind all that much. Only a serious threat will force it to lead reasonable politics. But Iran won't dare to attack Israel openly, as well as any other state...

Ok.
You just said that Iran is not a threat at all earlier.

And why Iran should invade Europe?

As part of the holy Islamic revolution that they have been spreading for the last two decades maybe?

Not a chance. Europe gets anti-american and pro-arabic recently and unlike our dear "Israel",
it doesn't stand on ground stolen from majorly Muslim population.

And in 10 years? In 20? You dont know what's gonna happen. So now it's unreasonable for them to do something, but imagine what will the Mullahs do when they have the bomb?!

[Ecthy]

Answer orange's question.

[Ecthy]

We know it's very hot in Naftaliland, that's no excuse for spreading racist pamphlets, dear.

[Eli]

Orange :

See my response to Heresson couple posts ago(my second reply in the thread).

[orange]

So because the US had mistaken in Iran once they wont be a threat?

No, i'm saying we don't repeat mistakes we've already made

[orange]

your responce to him didn't answer my question (or his for that matter)

[Heresson]

"Both radical.

Don't exagerrate

"Yeah, and what are they going to do? Vote the fundies out of their office?

Would You start the war having massive problems in your own state and having no chance that the war would unite the nation?

"Ok.
You just said that Iran is not a threat at all earlier.

A threat to a threat isn't a threat.

Anyway I think of it as a potential threat, materials for a bomb that won't explode unless You won't create it. Even for israel. What do You expect? Would Irand nuke Israel
risking lifes of thousands of Muslim comfaithfulls?

"As part of the holy Islamic revolution that they have been spreading for the last two decades maybe?

That's a part of wrong understanding of Muslim fundamentalism. they don't want to islamise christian
jewish or whatever nations, they want to rule Muslims according to what they consider the law of the God.

And in 10 years? In 20? You dont know what's gonna happen. So now it's unreasonable for them to do something, but imagine what will the Mullahs do when they have the bomb?!

Imagine; what would India and Pakistand do with themselves if the had nukes!
Wait... They have

[Gangerolf]

bomb them back to the middle ages!! oh wait, they already are in the middle ages. back to the stone age then

[Heresson]

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by Kepler
So's France.

We should invade France then.

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by Eli
I'm afraid that even if Israel attacks, it wont be as effective as an American attack because of the resources you have.

Nonsense. You basically degraded Iraq's nuclear ambitions in the 80's to the point where they are only now allegedly recovering. How mush more of an effective history do you need?

[Ecthy]

Israel actually fought Iraq? How exactly? Copters?

[orange]

are you kidding? We'll never break the Maginot Line's defenses

[Imran Siddiqui]

Etch: Israel bombed Iraq's nuclear plants in 1982 in a pre-emptive strike.

--

Btw, having nuclear power facilities is a FAR cry from developing nuclear weapons. They require different things. Just because a country has nuclear power doesn't mean they know how to get nuclear weapons and vice-versa.