Evil Christians kill animals while enlightened Atheist kills babies

[Sixchan]

You're killing us just describing it. Please stop.

[Jaakko]

Aren't you guys being a bit melodramatic, getting yourselves off like that from some nutbag's ravings? Do you do that everytime you find a moron in the world? Then again, that's exactly what establishments like CNS News count on...

The only thing I find interesting is the way Lincoln projects Singer's views into atheism in general.

[Stefu]

Eh? What's that got to do with anything Stefu?

Umm... something?

[Jaakko]

All show no go huh?

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

Bad title, Lincoln. It should have been "Atheists promote sex with dogs".

[Lemmy]

better than with children.

[Az]

Jaakko, as I said, The rant was targetted at the animal rights activists and sympths, that I know support this kind of thinking ( www.vhemt.org ). The fact that Lincoln has a hidden agenda of counter-trolling mobius has nothing to do with that.

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

Interestingly enough, Barry Clausen comes across as a bit of a loony in that excerpt. I suppose that's balanced reporting- make both sides look ridiculous.

[JCG]

I'd rather kill an animal than abort a baby, so there.

But if YOU want to abort a baby and at the same time you proclaim animal "rights" (?), you can do it, as long as you don't force me to watch it.

[Lung]

Ahh, it's good to see that nutcases permeate all human society, and cross all socio-economic and cultural boundaries!

Don't you just love exponential reasoning! "I like steaks, so all animals must be eaten!" or "people are greedy for money, so let's burn all money!" or "the bible says adultery is a sin, so women raped against their will by men who are not their husbands must be STONED TO DEATH!!" And i don't mean on the wacky green stuff!

Exponential reasoning ultimately ends in absurd conclusions, so believe in common sense, i say! It's the only domain to exclude delusional nutcases, so i say go with it

[Sava]

I'm not against animal testing if it is productive. Chegitz made a good comment to the effect of "what's the point?". I'm also Pro-Choice, and not entirely against euthenizing a deformed baby. Although, I would support an adoption/welfare system and would only support making that illegal if there was a system in place to care for the kids.

[Dr Strangelove]

Re: Evil Christians kill animals while enlightened Atheist kills babies

Originally posted by Lincoln
Singer defended his previous writings that humans and nonhumans can have "mutually satisfying" sexual relationships as long as they are consensual. When asked by CNSNews.com how an animal can consent to sexual contact with a human, he replied, "Your dog can show you when he or she wants to go for a walk and equally for nonviolent sexual contact, your dog or whatever else it is can show you whether he or she wants to engage in a certain kind of contact."

What if your dog shows you he wants to go out for some violent sexual contact? What about that? Suppose your dog wants to go out for an evening of a little of the good old "ultra-violence"?

[Urban Ranger]

Better than enlightened Christians shooting adults to protect embryoes.

[Guynemer]

Re: Evil Christians kill animals while enlightened Atheist kills babies

Originally posted by Lincoln
The moral standard of atheism is called survival of the fittest.

Oh, kiss my pale, overworked ass. Lincoln, what you don't know about atheism could fill the Great Pyramid.

I am so ****ing sick of being accused of having no morals because I'm an atheist. That's complete horse****, and you know it.

[DinoDoc]

It's called a counter-troll, Guy.