Gay eats little boy

[Peacemaker]

This is the funniest dam thread I've read in a long time

There are some people around here who really need to get a life.

[MrFun]

Originally posted by Lincoln
I implied that he has a narrow view that excludes him from clearly seeing the suffering of others. If the title was "Indians attack fort" would that be bashing Indians?

Which tribe of Amerindians, specifically??


But really -- this is a waste of time.

I have no narrow views -- it is you with narrow views.

[Guynemer]

No. The reason they were attacking said fort was likely because they were, you know, INDIANS.

Now how in holy blue **** does cannibalism relate to being gay?

IT DOESN'T. End of story. Get a ****ing life; seriously, this would be low for Spinky. For you, it's unforgivable.

[Lincoln]

What difference does it make what tribe? Would it be bashing Indians or not?

[DaShi]

Actually, this is a great troll. Look at all the accusations made against Lincoln just for posting a news article. Yet, the writer of the article, who has a far larger audience goes unscathed. Since when is journalistic integrity considered bigotry anyway. So gays are discriminated against. Should we all look the other way, if one eats a child because it wouldn't be PC otherwise. Or perhaps we should acknowledge that the culprit was sick irregardless of his sexuality. That a gay man could be just as depraved as a straight man. No better, no worse. Just HUMANLY flawed.

[Guynemer]

Lincoln did not just post the article, DaShi. He posted it with the title, "Gay eats little boy". Rather a large distinction there.

[Asher]

Or perhaps we should acknowledge that the culprit was sick irregardless of his sexuality. That a gay man could be just as depraved as a straight man. No better, no worse. Just HUMANLY flawed.

That's kinda our point.

There's no reason for the man to be described as a "Gay" rather than a "Man", it's obviously just a simple troll from a simple mind.

[Lincoln]

Then there should be no distinction made when a white male or a black woman or a Catholic priest commits a crime then.

[DaShi]

No ****! It's a troll. It's called baiting your audience.

As I said, by acknowledging the person is gay, he does more to show the equality of homo- and hetersexual men (probably not intentially though). He demonstrates that they are all sickos. That is of course, if you don't jump on your first instinct that it is gay bashing. Then it's definitely a troll.

[Asher]

If this title was "Black eats little boy" you'd be reamed also.

Or even "Catholic eats little boy".

[MrFun]

Lincoln -- there is a corruption present within the Catholic clergy -- that is why there was/is a focus on Catholic priests.

[DaShi]

Originally posted by Asher

That's kinda our point.

There's no reason for the man to be described as a "Gay" rather than a "Man", it's obviously just a simple troll from a simple mind.

Then you missed mine.

[Peacemaker]

ROTFLMGDAO

[Lincoln]

Originally posted by MrFun
Lincoln -- there is a corruption present within the Catholic clergy -- that is why there was/is a focus on Catholic priests.

Well do you think there is also a corruption in gay pedophiles or should we ignore it if they are gay but make the distinction if they are Catholic or priests or whatever? If you want to be known for your sexual orientation then you have to take the good with the bad. Touting all of the attributes of being gay is deceptive. My brother is gay and I have several close friends that are gay. They are not all happy campers. The fact is that most Catholic priests that abuse kids abuse boys not girls. Should we pretend that they are really girls?

[faded glory]

Fun stop trying to censor this freakin thread. Red faces and 'bigot' in every post isnt gonna bring Ming over. (well it could)

If you disagree, fine.