Gay eats little boy

[MrFun]

Originally posted by Lincoln
Calm down. There is a whole world out there that is not at their nearest gay pride parade. You should really respect the views of others who do not share your "pride" which is entirely centered on sexual orientation. There really is more to life than that.

Gay Pride is about the possibility of positive unity between all people of all sexual orientation -- including heterosexuals.

But you would not understand that.

And now I know why you took advantage of this boy's tragic death -- it was a bigoted, ignorant, spiteful reaction to my Gay Pride thread.

[Sarxis]

Originally posted by MrFun
...law-abiding, respectful gay citizens...

Isn't homosexuality technically illegal in most places?

I mean, so is pre-marital cohabitation with the opposite sex, and drug use.

Not that I am against any of these, so long as it stays out of my face. But what I am saying is: have the laws in the books been changed at all concerning these issues?

[MrFun]

There used to be laws against racial integration and interracial marriages.

What is your point???

[Boris Godunov]

Originally posted by Lincoln
Calm down. There is a whole world out there that is not at their nearest gay pride parade. You should really respect the views of others who do not share your "pride" which is entirely centered on sexual orientation. There really is more to life than that.

On the one hand you post a slanderously-titled thread and make equations of gays to child molestors, and then on the other you say we shouldn't get so wound up about that? Hypocrite.

It's things like this that make gay pride important celebrations, as they show people that, in the face of the kind of bigotry you profess, gays are come out stronger.

Respecting your views in no way entails us not being able to speak about or celebrate ours. Anti-gay folks are so brazenly hypocritical, however, that they equate gays just being open about who they are as being somehow repressive of your views. Well, your views don't trump our rights, so you can just sit there and ferment in your own bile.

[Lincoln]

Originally posted by Asher
Lincoln, I believe he's just upset that you felt the need to describe the man as "Gay" rather than simply "Man".

There are quirks in the English language that can be pretty offensive, like this.

Can you explain how his sexual orientation is relevant to him eating another person?

What? It's not?

* Asher looks at thread title.

So why is it there?

To get Mr Fun's attention. He wants a free reign to advertise his sexual preference and the glories of being gay which is fine. But the picture of all gays is not really that rosey. And the PC bs that forbids the telling of gay crimes while touting crimes against gays is dishonest and presents an unfair picture of reality.

[Sarxis]

Originally posted by MrFun
There used to be laws against racial integration and interracial marriages.

What is your point???

That's my point: there used to be laws, but are there still? A lot of times the culture changes, but the laws do not.

[Asher]

To get Mr Fun's attention.

Ah, a troll, okay then.

/me throws another bible at Lincoln's groin.

[MrFun]

Originally posted by Lincoln


To get Mr Fun's attention. He wants a free reign to advertise his sexual preference and the glories of being gay which is fine. But the picture of all gays is not really that rosey. And the PC bs that forbids the telling of gay crimes while touting crimes against gays is dishonest and presents an unfair picture of reality.

Child molestation and pedophilia are repugnant REGARDLESS of sexual orientation.


And read my last two posts.

[General Ludd]

Originally posted by Lincoln
You have not even voiced even one note of outrage at what happened to the little boy. Shame on you...

Nor have you. Infact, all you have done is use his death to fuel your gay bashing.

[Lincoln]

Originally posted by Osweld



Nor have you. Infact, all you have done is use his death to fuel your gay bashing.

The outrage should be obvious in anyone reading the article. And I have not bashed any gays.

[Boris Godunov]

Originally posted by Anunikoba


Isn't homosexuality technically illegal in most places?

I mean, so is pre-marital cohabitation with the opposite sex, and drug use.

Not that I am against any of these, so long as it stays out of my face. But what I am saying is: have the laws in the books been changed at all concerning these issues?

There is no law in the U.S. about being gay. There may be laws about gay sex, but not in being gay itself. And those laws are certainly wrong.

[General Ludd]

Originally posted by Lincoln


The outrage should be obvious in anyone reading the article.

So why do you accuse MrFun of not being outraged?

And I have not bashed any gays.

Uh-Huh, I suppose this thread just spontaneously created itself too, right?

[TCO]

Lincoln,

Let it go. This is unlike you.

[Guynemer]

Did someone steal Lincoln's login? This is so not his style.

If not--Lincoln, this is the most worthless, pathetic troll I've ever seen; and that includes Mr. "I'm Not A Racist! Really!" Caligastia.

[Lincoln]

I implied that he has a narrow view that excludes him from clearly seeing the suffering of others. If the title was "Indians attack fort" would that be bashing Indians?