Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
This makes little sense. Why would it try to force Netscape out so it can dominate Media Player
?
I take it you meant to say "predatory", right? Predatory pricing can be utilized to increase market share, yes, but also to keep it, by creating high entry barriers. But MS needs no such application - IE's raison d'être isn't to kill Netscape, since it's already done that, it's to leverage MS applications in fields where MS does not yet dominate - Windows Media Player and phrase to domain resolving being prime exemples.
This makes little sense. Why would it try to force Netscape out so it can dominate Media Player
?
I mean, it really isn't sending out much of a message, both Quicktime and RealPlayer have free versions as well.... and MS hasn't shown me squat that it will increase the cost of IE or Media Player at all.
). There is a remedy that the judge over the case is considering, but it is rumored that the judge may consider an even harsher punishment. No matter what happens M$ is going to be prosecuted it seems. Let's just hope that the remedy is fair and just for all. Amen to that.
Comment