Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pornography

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • @ chegitz.

    you didn't believe THAT!


    it's ok . we all have our flaws.
    urgh.NSFW

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Wraith
      --"But pornography provides additional encouragment, that's all"

      So how do you feel about kids watching violent movies or TV shows? (Okay, so Mr. Fun's changed his mind, but how about Jon Miller?)

      --"I have read that children in the US (particularly girls) are going through puberty at a younger age"

      This is much more likely to be a reaction to something like good nutrition than to viewing porn

      --"porn does degreade women and men"

      Heh. Some of the stuff is actually done quite well, and doesn't really count as degrading. Your statement is a bit too much of a generalization.
      BTW, what about boxing? Is it degrading? If not, why?

      Wraith
      Someday, we'll look back on this, laugh nervously and change the subject.
      there is still the fact that kids are being moved towards something that emotionally they are not ready for

      the age thing was my counter that kids were able to do stuff or think about it at younger ages than previously (While in general being less mature for longer)

      I am for, for various ages, kids being limited in their exposure to violence in the media and telvision until they are emotionally mature

      I think however that violence is something easilier handled at a younger age, Sex is for adults (As is porn)

      Jon Miller
      Jon Miller-
      I AM.CANADIAN
      GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
        You know, if you were so young that you didn't know what you were doing maybe you shouldn'y have been doing it. It could be argued that you weren't "relieving tensions". Did you learn to do this entirely on your own initiative or did someone expose you to it?
        I was having ejaculations (mostly wet dreams) when I was eleven without knowing what the hell was going on. However, I also started shaving when I was twelve, so maybe I was just an extremely early bloomer.
        <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

        Comment


        • Originally posted by chegitz guevara
          I think that there is a paticular problem that Playboy causes, which is it sets up an unrealistic fantasy for men on what sexually attractive women are supposed to be. Since most women don't have impossibly skinny waists, flawless skin, and gravity defying breasts, it's a little hard to find a perfect women
          I'm not just adressing Che here, but his quote is relevant to the arguement that porn has warped our sense of beauty. Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that other more "legal" forms of entertainment had warped our sense of beauty many moons before you first laid eyes on porn?

          For instance movie stars, clothing catalogs, people on television in general. Are these people not exceedingly attractive, and therefore unrealistically beautiful? For instance, you could blame porn for a young child feeling overweight and ugly, though chances are the person she's comparing herself to isn't some bombastic porn star, in fact, she's probably trying to emulate some teen pop star a la Brittany Spears who we, both men and society, tend to glorify.

          What I'm suggesting is that this typical arguement gets well ahead of itself in that it could be argued our sensibilities about beauty are warped long before anyone gets their hands on porn. Porn is just an easy target for criticism and is perhaps unabashedly about (male?) sexuality and the human body.

          Comment


          • I think WE is spot-on.
            Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
            Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/

            Comment


            • In general, I don't find that many people in television or rock bands or movies to be presenting themselves sexually in states of complete undress. If I found them remoutely attractive, I could still only specualte as to what Ms. Spears or Ms. Aniston looks like without clothes. I do not have to wonder about Miss July.
              Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

              Comment


              • Originally posted by chegitz guevara
                In general, I don't find that many people in television or rock bands or movies to be presenting themselves sexually in states of complete undress. If I found them remoutely attractive, I could still only specualte as to what Ms. Spears or Ms. Aniston looks like without clothes. I do not have to wonder about Miss July.
                Well I guess you've never seen the ads for women's underwear in the newpaper? You've never perused a catalog of Victoria's Secret -- how much is really left to speculate? Not to mention the limited clothing Ms. Spears has, or has not, donned in various highly watched entertainment episodes -- Super Bowl, Music Awards, etc. Did the Sports Illistrated swim suit issue leave you vague clues as well? I imagine sleepless nights spent speculating whether or not Ms. Aniston weighed 125 or 225, no? What of the various Mtv videos with women in multiple stages of undress -- say, the video for that Moulin Rouge song where the perfromers wore articles of lingerie? Pick up an issue of Bazzar or Elle next time your at your local grocer and follow the trail of mysterious clues you find there. It all leads to the same place inspector Klueso, blatant sexuality. The varying degrees of nakedness doesn't change that.

                Comment


                • I have nothing against teenagers enjoying porn, nor adults enjoying porn.

                  I enjoy it myself.
                  A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by MrFun
                    I have nothing against teenagers enjoying porn, nor adults enjoying porn.

                    I enjoy it myself.
                    What about the elderly? Do you have anything against that?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by David Floyd
                      I mean, for a kid - worst case it causes masturbation, right? How is that bad?
                      Carpul Tunnel Syndrome
                      "Chegitz, still angry about the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991?
                      You provide no source. You PROVIDE NOTHING! And yet you want to destroy capitalism.. you criminal..." - Fez

                      "I was hoping for a Communist utopia that would last forever." - Imran Siddiqui

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by WhiteElephants
                        What about the elderly? Do you have anything against that?
                        I was under the impression that the elderly were adults.
                        <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by WhiteElephants


                          What about the elderly? Do you have anything against that?


                          Are you implying that elderly people do not qualify as adults, so therefore, I had to designate them separately??

                          A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                          Comment


                          • What about the senile? They're special.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by MrFun

                              Are you implying that elderly people do not qualify as adults, so therefore, I had to designate them separately??
                              I don't know, can you really consider yourself an adult when you consistently crap your pants?

                              Damn people, when did this turn into John Ashsroft's Bible study group? Laugh a little, eh? I know it's Sunday and all, but c'mon.

                              Besides if I hadn't responded to MrFun I probably would have been accussed of ignoring him.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by WhiteElephants
                                Besides if I hadn't responded to MrFun I probably would have been accussed of ignoring him.
                                <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X