Democrat Suggests Administration Involvement In 9-11 Attack

[TCO]

Originally posted by joseph1944

I only have one or two picture from the yard. The photo group boss would not give anything away over the years. I ask nicely a few times and he said NO. He had thousand of picture. I wonder if he kept some for his self.
The 688 avatar. I was the Shop 11 Test Supervisor on the SSN 688 overhaul so I can use it legally. That was our last overhaul to.

What kind of shipyard worker are you if you don't know how to "appropriate" a few items like that!

[TCO]

Mckinney wasn't vindicated. We heard stories immediatlye after the attacks that their had been some limited intel information about possible threats. That is a far cry from knowing what was going to happen and letting it happen. McKinney is an idiot. A disgrace to this fine state.

[MosesPresley]

The Bush line via Ari Fleischer has been there was no foreknowledge at all. It's in all of the papers and on the TV news. McKinney is still a little out there in left field with some of her claims, but she was right about one thing, the Bush administration had been warned about Osama Bin Laden and did nothing. It was well known at the time that he was a man who would murder people. Someone should have taken the threat more seriously. The Bush Administration is now saying that they didn't act on the threat, because it was only a traditional hijacking and no one thought the planes would be used as missles. This statement is weak. A planned hijacking by a known terrorist such as Bin Laden should have been taken very seriously.

There will now be the long overdue investigation into what led up to these attacks and hopefully we will find out who dropped the ball.

I find it interesting that everyone who was so quick to trash her and dismiss her accusations as a wacko's fantasy are very quiet now.

[The Mad Monk]

Re: Re: Democrat Suggests Administration Involvement In 9-11 Attack

Originally posted by MosesPresley




Looks like she has been vindicated.

Not really. She's still a lunatic that wanted an investigation without a legitimate reason.

The fact that there is now a legitimate reason does not in any way change the fact that she's a loon.

[GeneralTacticus]

And the legitimate reason is?

[The Mad Monk]

The legitimate reason is that there is now sufficient evidence that warnings may have been at least ignored by somebody. It could very well be that it's a procedural problem, and nobody is at fault per se, but an investigation should be carried out so that better procedures can be created, at the very least. It would also be useful in dissuading the conspicy nuts out there that there is no cover-up.

I do not believe this can damage the President; there are reams of data to go through every day, and it is the job of people under to ensure that the noise gets filtered out, and important information gets to him. I think it's likely that some mid-level official misjudged the value of the data.

[Panag]

Re: Re: Re: Democrat Suggests Administration Involvement In 9-11 Attack

Originally posted by The Mad Monk


Not really. She's still a lunatic that wanted an investigation without a legitimate reason.

The fact that there is now a legitimate reason does not in any way change the fact that she's a loon.

hi ,

also , she wanted an investigation without that she knows the the country and its situation , ..............
its nice to cry of a mountain , do an investigation , but when the investigation gets to close to certain aspect's or certain people and their agency's , ........;it tends to look in the opposite way , .......

have a nice day

[ZoboZeWarrior]

Why they didn't stop OBL before the 9/11 ?

Maybe some gouvernment members decided to let OBL strikes to have a potent casus-belli. In this case they didn't foresee the high number of casualties.

But maybe not. They tried to stop the terrorist organization but failed. It isn't an esay job to stop quickly a well planed terror attack.

Now it's clear that the passport found in rubbles, the video tapes found in afghanistan were BS. They had all those informations before.

[Lincoln]

This is called a tempest in a teapot. Democrats are grasping at straws to try and deflect attention from their boy Clinton and the first trade center bombing and the Oaklahoma city bombing as well as a few others that happened on his watch. Neither Clinton nor Bush are responsible for these surprise attacks. No one can prevent terrorism as Israel is proving now. It is too bad that some seek to use these facts for political gain but that is not going to change.

[SpencerH]

The funny thing is that an investigation could (but probably wouldnt) allow for a needed reorganization of the intelligence community is the US. Given the paranoia that can infect intel at high levels its a wonder that they get anything right, especially when it requires cross-agency coordination of assets.

[Rand Al'Tor]

On Newsmax both Clinton and Bush are accused at the moment.

[Rand Al'Tor]

speaking of Newsmax. I'd like to bring this thread to the attention of some of the great population of Swedes here. http://www.newsmax.com/ubb/Forum16/HTML/001135.html

Now remember, Don't you be trollin' at Newsmax y'hear?

[SpencerH]

Originally posted by WFHermans
MadMonk, you just broke a lot of European laws by posting this...this....conspiracy stuff!!! I mean if we allow this, then...then someone will start claiming that the CIA killed JFK.

Go turn yourself in to the Swedish police.

And here is a evil link with everything you are not supposed to know about 911:

http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wtc.html

Don't click it, you will be breaking the law...aaargh...no..don't....

(It's a Switzerland-based site. Not possible for the European Community censors to ban yet.)

Could someone please explain this. I havent heard of this law

[TCO]

McKinney is an idiot. Trust me.

[My Wife Hates CIV]

What's so sad about this is the way the Vice President is acting. Don't make anything of this?!? I do believe it was the republicans who wasted several million investigating a blowjob. Now their retarded leader Bush screws up and we're not to look into it. Things sure are different now. Double standard or what??