Originally posted by OzzyKP
Kant says if you can make a statement and imagine that everyone believed it, if it was consistent then it would be moral, correct?
Kant says if you can make a statement and imagine that everyone believed it, if it was consistent then it would be moral, correct?
So if a neo-nazi in theory believed that killing people was wrong except Jews, could that be universalized? And if the definition of "people" changed depending on who you asked would this exercise need to use the neo-nazi's definition? How would this work?
Comment