Operation Anaconda: American Troops DEAD

[MichaeltheGreat]

Originally posted by Guynemer


Oh, I've already drawn my own conclusions, as I'm sure you'll recall. However, I don't feel the need to clog 'Poly with that picture again--I might inadvertantly cause yet another crash. Suffice it to say that if you are, in fact, neither a DL, nor mentally unstable, then you are the biggest jackass I have ever had the misfortune to encounter, either online or off.

But enough of this pleasant threadjacking. Please, continue to expose yourself. Sunlight is the best disinfectant.

[Comrade Tribune]

Originally posted by DinoDoc
You bore me.

I am flexible about how to bury the capitalists; I will not rule out boring them to death as an option.

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by Wiglaf
Are you with them or something?

I'm with myself on this one.

Why doesn't the Canadian Secretary of Snobisity (Delightful Defense? I don't know) complain about how America is "wasting" his country's money in support costs by not using its troops already in the region?

We are using the resources they have that prove useful to our various opperations, ie Canadian snipers are taking part in this particular opperation while the rest of the Canadian forces defend the Kahndahar (sp) Airport. Are there Canadian resources in Afghanistan that you feel should be put to use in Opperation Anaconda? If so, which ones and why?

[Richelieu]

Originally posted by Wiglaf


Why doesn't the Canadian Secretary of Snobisity (Delightful Defense? I don't know) complain about how America is "wasting" his country's money in support costs by not using its troops already in the region?

I just did. Sent him an email to say that i want to see at least 3 Canadian casualties a day (+ a couple of serious injuries).
I'm done paying for these guys to go there and - can you believe it - actually have the nerve to come back here alive.

[Tom201]

Originally posted by Wiglaf
What I want to know is, why are all the major battles and operations in Afghanistan that involve massive and terrible losses of life America's problem? This is supposed to be a coalition!

Well it is Americas problem...

I dont really support the military alliance of europe with the US in Afghanistan.
It is wrong that it was an atack against "the whole free civilizest world". It was an atack against the US and the US only.
The islamic Fundamentalists hate the US (and Israel) not Europe.

Therefor it is a US problem not a Europe one, the US have enough power to solve their problems without the aid of Europe.
We shouldnt have gotten envolved.

It is reasonable that after Europe is envolved dispite that, US soldiers should take the main risk (but well not US soldiers but allied afghan soldiers take it by now - noone cares about their looses).


The new Trade-War against Europe from Bush shows that it doesnt pay to be his ally.

Originally posted by Wiglaf
That's a big no-no under the Geneva Convention, dragging away soldiers and shooting them like that. You still think we ought to give those terrorist dogs in Cuba the right to jeopardize security for stupid things like wearing hats or whatever? They're lucky they get anything now, the monsters.

Yea, lets put them in the gas chambers

[KrazyHorse]

Wiglaf never ceases to entertain. Keep 'em coming Wiggy.

"You're bad allies because you refuse to complain about how we're using the soldiers you sent us".

[Guynemer]

Originally posted by KrazyHorse
Wiglaf never ceases to entertain. Keep 'em coming Wiggy.

"You're bad allies because you refuse to complain about how we're using the soldiers you sent us".

Somewhere, there's an orderly tied up and gagged, looking on helplessly while Wiggy bangs away on the psych ward's computer.

[MOBIUS]

Originally posted by faded glory
Why did they name it anaconda? I would of called it Stinging Scorpion, Paralyzed Camel, Boxcutter, Possum, Hot Sand...anything. Just no Anacanda. It sounds dumb

It's called 'Anaconda' because the Taliban and Al Qaeda in these areas are being slowly crushed in an ever decreasing noose around their necks...

Sort of like being 'constricted'...

[OldWarrior_42]

Well it is Americas problem...

I dont really support the military alliance of europe with the US in Afghanistan.
It is wrong that it was an atack against "the whole free civilizest world". It was an atack against the US and the US only.
The islamic Fundamentalists hate the US (and Israel) not Europe.

Therefor it is a US problem not a Europe one, the US have enough power to solve their problems without the aid of Europe.
We shouldnt have gotten envolved.

It is reasonable that after Europe is envolved dispite that, US soldiers should take the main risk (but well not US soldiers but allied afghan soldiers take it by now - noone cares about their looses).


The new Trade-War against Europe from Bush shows that it doesnt pay to be his ally.

Wow. Thats a loaded statement , if ever there was one.

[ravagon]

Originally posted by Tom201


Well it is Americas problem...

I dont really support the military alliance of europe with the US in Afghanistan.
It is wrong that it was an atack against "the whole free civilizest world". It was an atack against the US and the US only.
The islamic Fundamentalists hate the US (and Israel) not Europe.

Therefor it is a US problem not a Europe one, the US have enough power to solve their problems without the aid of Europe.
We shouldnt have gotten envolved.

It is reasonable that after Europe is envolved dispite that, US soldiers should take the main risk (but well not US soldiers but allied afghan soldiers take it by now - noone cares about their looses).

Not to harp on again with a, by now, old argument, but if the US of A had that attitude after the end of the second WW you'd be eating borscht and singing the Soviet National anthem right now ... Comrade...

I can say this as I'm not American and haven't said it before.
That and derek doesn't seem to be around right now ...

[Case]

Originally posted by Guynemer
Somewhere, there's an orderly tied up and gagged, looking on helplessly while Wiggy bangs away on the psych ward's computer.

Actually, I'd say that the ordelies encourage him for their own amusemt

[Tolls]

"It's called 'Anaconda' because the Taliban and Al Qaeda in these areas are being slowly crushed in an ever decreasing noose around their necks... "

They should do what we do and pick the next name in a Codename list...then you'd end up with really great names, like our version of Desert Storm was something like "Jeremy"...

While the opposition is pissing themselves laughing at the ridiculous codename, you can pick them off with ease!

As for the rest of the topic...bollocks!

[child of Thor]

Originally posted by Wiglaf


OK, let's look at Britain. They've got the resources to send planes and troops over, don't tell me they don't. The money, everything - it's all there and in place. It's the bad politics of a British soldier dying that keep them from sending someone in one of these choppers on the front lines..and that's too bad.

I think you'll find that British guys are there(they were from the begining) and have been dying just as much as anyone else. You won't hear about it though. And it's something we take for granted in these situations.

[Wiglaf]

Yea, lets put them in the gas chambers

Why is it that people like you and Horse complain when we take off the terrorist commie dog bastard's hats for security reasons but not when one of our captured spec ops troops is dragged away and murdered in disgusting violation of the Geneva Convention by the Taliban in Afghanistan? JUST FOR THAT you deserve to be LAUGHED AT BY A PRIEST, ROBBED BY A POLICE OFFICER, and BITTEN BY A ZOOKEEPER.

[Az]

every thread is a damn pearl...

I say :
5/10 on originality ,
9.6/10 on performance...

he is not to be taken seriously .