Tweet
Yes, we are latent racists. The southern Europeans on the other hand seem to be far more open about it. Look for example at Paiktis' comments on Albanians and gypsies, or Mr. Fini here in Italy, etc., etc.
-
-
don't have much time but...
It is somewhat expected but still a bit disharteaning to see people abandoning arguments, because actually they don't have any, about what I am saying.
Instead they resort to assumptions on me, my allegded personal experiences and to "humour" which is a painless way to express how one really feels.
Instead of attacking could you not simply stop and simply think? (I know it's a revolutionary consept to some of you, even the most alledgedly devoided of sentiment, especially when it is about matters that escape your own microcosmos... or "well founded" values)Comment
-
Roland is biggoted towards southern europeans. Paiktis is biggoted about Africans.
That much is plain; but look you two, enough already. Both of your nations have long and proud histories packed with past achievements. That was yesterday. The last century was the American century. This century is going to be yet another American century.
We are the future. I say: "Live it or live with it!"
"I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!Comment
-
Austria's history can't possibly compare to Hellenic history. It's like comparing a deux chevaux with a ferrari.
But this is besides the point. Dr. Strangelove, besides your cute avatar, you too are reading what you want to read.
Forget about filling me with your accomodating assumtions (and shame on you Dr. Strange for that) and start thinking about what I am saying.Comment
-
Re: don't have much time but...
You want me to think about my racism? In your eyes I'm racist just for being North european. There's no arguing against a generalisation like that. If I told you that I have dated several dark skinned girls, would that change your mind about me personally?Originally posted by paiktis22
It is somewhat expected but still a bit disharteaning to see people abandoning arguments, because actually they don't have any, about what I am saying.
Instead they resort to assumptions on me, my allegded personal experiences and to "humour" which is a painless way to express how one really feels.
Instead of attacking could you not simply stop and simply think? (I know it's a revolutionary consept to some of you, even the most alledgedly devoided of sentiment, especially when it is about matters that escape your own microcosmos... or "well founded" values)Well, lets just imagine my question is not hypothetical then...
-
My God, I'm thirty, I need a drink - english textbook spelling errorComment
-
Still, it was unexpected.Originally posted by Roland
LOL. Not sure about the 1st crusade, but during the 2nd crusade the germans already threatened to take Constantinoples, and Venice has always been keen on the region. So that was not unexpected. More down to infighting.
If you consider the fact that the first crusade was originally conducted after a Byzantine request and Constantinople had successfully repulsed every expected attemp to capture it then it is very unlikely it was expected. At list by the Byzantine leaderiship of that time.
I don't comprehend your logic.Originally posted by Roland
Well if Byzantium counts as an empire post 1204, then Austria has been an empire from 996 to today.
Byzantine empire after 1204 was what were left after centuries of strife. After 8 centuries of thrive, lasted 2,5 more centuries and then collapsed.
And regarding Austria you are refering to a part of the Holy Roman Empire centuries before it was shaped to the AustroHungarian empire.
Totally irrelevant
Originally posted by Roland
We did not beat the Turks then. That was a bit earlier, like in 1529, 1664, 1683... in WWI we were allied with'em.
So I assume you still have a lot of reading to do.
Who said that?
"You only beated the Turkish (the one part of the sentence) while fell like a leaf in World War I (the other part of the sentence)" is what I said.
I didn't say that you beated the Turkish during the world war I
Chill out dude I know who were your allies in World War I and I know what my country took after the end of it (Smyrna region and East Thrace).
Look man, I don't have time to fool around.Originally posted by Roland
No, I want to show blind racism. Paiktis told me so.
I have more important things to do.
If you want to seriously discuss with me I am available to do so.
If you want to play around then go and jerk off in the playground...Comment
-
paiktis has lost it.....
Who's the one without arguments, who?????? Aren't you that person......sheessss grow up man. You started a discussion without any argument to strengthen your statement and now you are telling us we don't have arguments???Originally posted by paiktis22
It is somewhat expected but still a bit disharteaning to see people abandoning arguments, because actually they don't have any, about what I am saying.
I feel sorry for you, I really do.
Comment
-
Strangelove:
"We are the future."
No, you are a temproray aberration.
paiktis:
"Austria's history can't possibly compare to Hellenic history. It's like comparing a deux chevaux with a ferrari."
Indeed, but I was comparing it to your history, not ancient hellenic history. Just because you call yourself Hellen- ....Comment
-
Congratulations dudeOriginally posted by Dr Strangelove
Roland is biggoted towards southern europeans. Paiktis is biggoted about Africans.
That much is plain; but look you two, enough already. Both of your nations have long and proud histories packed with past achievements. That was yesterday. The last century was the American century. This century is going to be yet another American century.
We are the future. I say: "Live it or live with it!"
I haven't heared anyone saying the opposite so far in this thread so where does this nuke come from?
Comment
-
Then what on earth are you doing here, swallowing my obvious troll hook, line, sinker....Originally posted by Keygen
Look man, I don't have time to fool around.
Just two serious things:
1204 was not surprising, it was the infighting between Isaak and forgot-his-name.
The story of the Catalans is quite interesting:
Comment
-
Denail is a wonderful defense mechanism, is it not?Originally posted by Roland
"We are the future."
No, you are a temproray aberration.I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator RubioComment
-
Denial ? Defense ? Well American, it really hurts when your nationalist halluzinations aren't shared, huh ?Originally posted by DinoDoc
Denail is a wonderful defense mechanism, is it not?
Comment
-
Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you.Originally posted by Roland
Well American, it really hurts when your nationalist halluzinations aren't shared, huh ?
I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator RubioComment
-
Excellent choice of quote there.Originally posted by DinoDoc
Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you.
Comment
-
It's nice to see that someone who was not born in the Iberian peninsula knows that Athens and other Greek territories once belonged to the crown of Aragon. I'm impressed.
Comment
Comment