Well, again we're gonna have problems discussing this because of our wildly different beliefs. But, I think it's reasonable to say that a nation is a nation if other nations recognize it as such.
Isn't that definition a bit circular? So if the world community decides to stop calling the US a nation, it's no longer a nation? And it then no longer becomes "immoral" for other states to intervene in the US? Doesn't this definition allow for the very same world government you believe it prevents? Would intervention somehow have become "moral" in Iraq if the governments aroudn the world refuse to call it a nation?
What if the various criminal organizations decide to call each other nations, but don't acknowledge the states of the governments in the various Parliaments and Congresses and so forth around world? Which set of "nations" would actually be nations?
This really is an extremely incoherent definition.
Now, you ask, where did those other nations come from? Well, they've pretty much always been. Ever since people came together to form primitive governments - to get out of the state of nature - there have been nations. So, my best answer is nations just ARE.
Comment