Originally posted by Berzerker
Dr Strangelove -
Yeah, barrooms are full of potsmokers getting into brawls. Since you've acknowledged that many people who use drugs use multiple drugs, just how do you know it's the marijuana that is "implicated"?
Ramo has already refuted your claim that crime didn't increase. But according to Commerce Dept statistics posted here a while back in a similar debate, alcohol consumption did increase.
No one here even compared pre-prohibition and prohibition crime rates. I have mentioned in past debates that the murder rate dropped 13 years in a row following the repeal of prohibition and the stats Ramo posted support that claim.
There was a clear decrease after prohibition using stats from the 20's and 30's, explain that one away.
And yet you would have us compare stats from 1905 with 1935? Ramo offered stats including prohibition and post-prohibition years.
So they had no national crime statistics prior to 1920 but they had deaths from liver disease? Where is your source? The Commerce Dept stats show per capita alcohol consumption increased during prohibition.
It must be blissful to discard rebuttals with accusations of deceit. Why are we to trust anything you claim based on government data since government wants these drugs to remain illegal?
While you accuse the anti-prohibition crowd of playing nasty tricks for not citing statistics from 1900-1910, in the next breath you tell us stats prior to 1920 are unreliable.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4df3/f4df38678eb27eccdcbdb1f6c15b06f5455a41d2" alt="Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)"
Which would mean the stats from 1920 on are more accurate. And those stats refute your claim that crime did not increase under prohibition because they clearly show an enormous drop in homocide rates after prohibition was repealed. I'd love to hear you explain why crime rates have been so much higher since the late 60's when Nixon began the drug war.
Sikander -
Source?
Gareth -
So you're claiming marijauna has a similar
impact on reflexes as alcohol? You can't be serious! And claiming marijuana has a similar impact on the lungs as tobacco is also preposterous unless you mean only by consuming roughly equal amounts and not comparing the typical pot smoker with the typical cigarette smoker - a joint or two a day compared to 1 to 2 packs a day.
Of course, pot smokers on average don't smoke nearly as long as cigarette smokers so it's no surprise it's the tobacco users who die in such amazing numbers while the prohibitionists cannot point to anyone who actually died from a pot-related disease.
Oh nonsense, most pot users do not indulge like you claim to do. In fact, I've never heard of anyone who consumed as much pot as you.
Freedom - darn right!
Selfish? You are the one who wants to steal our money - "taxes" - to put millions of people in cages for failing to get your permission to ingest their own property!
And you accuse your victims of being selfish? Might as well say, "I want to rule the country, and you'll are selfish for opposing me".
Dr Strangelove -
Yeah, barrooms are full of potsmokers getting into brawls. Since you've acknowledged that many people who use drugs use multiple drugs, just how do you know it's the marijuana that is "implicated"?
Ramo has already refuted your claim that crime didn't increase. But according to Commerce Dept statistics posted here a while back in a similar debate, alcohol consumption did increase.
No one here even compared pre-prohibition and prohibition crime rates. I have mentioned in past debates that the murder rate dropped 13 years in a row following the repeal of prohibition and the stats Ramo posted support that claim.
There was a clear decrease after prohibition using stats from the 20's and 30's, explain that one away.
And yet you would have us compare stats from 1905 with 1935? Ramo offered stats including prohibition and post-prohibition years.
So they had no national crime statistics prior to 1920 but they had deaths from liver disease? Where is your source? The Commerce Dept stats show per capita alcohol consumption increased during prohibition.
It must be blissful to discard rebuttals with accusations of deceit. Why are we to trust anything you claim based on government data since government wants these drugs to remain illegal?
While you accuse the anti-prohibition crowd of playing nasty tricks for not citing statistics from 1900-1910, in the next breath you tell us stats prior to 1920 are unreliable.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4df3/f4df38678eb27eccdcbdb1f6c15b06f5455a41d2" alt="Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)"
Which would mean the stats from 1920 on are more accurate. And those stats refute your claim that crime did not increase under prohibition because they clearly show an enormous drop in homocide rates after prohibition was repealed. I'd love to hear you explain why crime rates have been so much higher since the late 60's when Nixon began the drug war.
Sikander -
Source?
Gareth -
So you're claiming marijauna has a similar
impact on reflexes as alcohol? You can't be serious! And claiming marijuana has a similar impact on the lungs as tobacco is also preposterous unless you mean only by consuming roughly equal amounts and not comparing the typical pot smoker with the typical cigarette smoker - a joint or two a day compared to 1 to 2 packs a day.
Of course, pot smokers on average don't smoke nearly as long as cigarette smokers so it's no surprise it's the tobacco users who die in such amazing numbers while the prohibitionists cannot point to anyone who actually died from a pot-related disease.
Oh nonsense, most pot users do not indulge like you claim to do. In fact, I've never heard of anyone who consumed as much pot as you.
Freedom - darn right!
Selfish? You are the one who wants to steal our money - "taxes" - to put millions of people in cages for failing to get your permission to ingest their own property!
And you accuse your victims of being selfish? Might as well say, "I want to rule the country, and you'll are selfish for opposing me".
I've seen some of the literature put out by the anti-prohibition groups in the late 20's and early 30's. The statisitics put out by the Department of Commerce that the Schaffer site refers to weren't available at the time, so what the anti-Prohibition groups did is compare various state and city statisitics prior to 1920 to the FBI statistics which became available in the 1920s.
I'd also like to point out that the source referrenced by the Schaffer site is probably worthless without a publication date, and I'm wondering when did the Commerce department take on the function of compiling crime statisitics? Did the great J. Edgar Hoover, so famous for his jealous protection of his political fiefdom, actually allow another Federal department to get away with encroaching on his territory?
If you look closely at the statistics shown on the Schaffer site you might notice that the homicide wave actually peaked nearly two years after the repeal of prohibition. Could it be that the wave of crime in the late 20s and early 30s was actually more fueled by the depression than by prohibition?
Comment