Should US "Allies" Be Attacked?

[Asher]

You so don't get it.

[n.c.]

http://www.trolls.com/catalog/

[Wiglaf]

This shows nothing other than the simple fact that I have won yet another arguement.

I scooped yo ass like ice cream, asher. 21 flavors. admit it.

[Asher]

Originally posted by Wiglaf
I scooped yo ass like ice cream, asher. 21 flavors. admit it.

You're scooping something out of an ass, but it's not ice cream.

[Wiglaf]

Pshaw.

I've won, you stopped arguing. Falling back on a canned half sentence doesn't get you a cookie unless you win an arguement on the side, asher.

Excuse me, I'm going to go get a cookie.

[rev]

I post again:

[Rogan Josh]

If the US were ever to bomb the UK -> Goodbye US!!

You do know that the UK has enough nukes to completely obliterate every inch of the US don't ya?



Who let the troll out of his cage....?

[Wiglaf]

How is this a troll, J? I'm too right for once?

If you listened, you'd notice there was nothing nuclear about the plan to economically screw the UK and Canada. Until I get a VALID REASON, instead of that garbage, I'm completely convinced there's nothing immoral or impossible about taking action against certain foreign nations for their refusal to help out in this time of need when asked.

[The Emperor Fabulous]

RIGHT?! RIGHT?! YOURE RIGHT?!

Costing the lives of countless others because they won't help the United States?

Bringing us to a war that in no way the United States will survive (or, most likely, the world)?

Believing that justice is our allies suffering attacks from terrorists (BTW, they foiled plots over in Europe)?

Please answer me this: Why should we attack those who are causing us no harm in a war the the United States is PERFECTLY CAPABLE of handleing itself?

Oh, FYI, 6,000 British troops are being held out of Afghanistan by GEORGE W. BUSH. Also, there are Canadian, Japanese, British, and Australian ships in the Persian Gulf and the Indian Ocean. The Spanish, Italians, and Germans have uncovered numerous plots destined for completion both here and abroad.

Lets speculate, however, for the purposes of argument, that they weren't helping us in any way. Why shouldn't we attack our allies? Because it is POINTLESS! There is no reason to start a second war. There is no reason to have our friends become our enemies. There is no reason to destroy the world economy. There is no reason to attack a third party simply because we were the ones to be hurt by a second party. There is no reason to cost thousands, perhaps millions of lives. There is no reason for this thread to even exist, because it is a pointless troll to get people fired up.

Wiglaf and Bob, I have to congradulate you on both your stubborness and your arrogance. Your mothers should be proud.

[Wiglaf]

Say what you want. The only reason Britain and Canada aren't sending troops into battle is because of the political nature of EF. In the UK, for sure, an involved military campaign wouldn't exactly be popular.

Oh, but if they're attacked, TOTALLY different story. No matter what America says.

Therefore, Britain is a lying, commie, selfish country, as is Canada. Bush has been seen in front of the UN demanding more action from allies - I haven't heard anything about him holding you back. Hell, even if the US imposed restrictions, why aren't you making any noise? September 11 was an attack on your nation as well, according to Blair at least....go for the gold.

WWIII? Naw.

[Shi Huangdi]

Sorry but this troll is over the top.

[Wiglaf]

Care to explain why?

[Asher]

Originally posted by Wiglaf
Care to explain why?

No one should have to.

[The Emperor Fabulous]

Care to explain why they are "commie"?

[Asher]

Check my sig.