Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Should US "Allies" Be Attacked?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Just a question Wiglaf. Did you just choose to ignore my post because I'm right?
    "I predict your ignore will rival Ben's" - Ecofarm
    ^ The Poly equivalent of:
    "I hope you can see this 'cause I'm [flipping you off] as hard as I can" - Ignignokt the Mooninite

    Comment


    • What post?

      Comment


      • 1. US attacks ROW
        2. US gets his ass kicked
        3. World rejoices



        Let the US attack. Would be really funny to see to US using a Hitler-style war on just about every non-supporting nation in the world. Hell, in a direct confrontation the US couldn't even defeat Vietnam, so what makes anyone think the US can take on Russia+China+Europe+etc, etc, etc. I personally would love it if they'd try Byebye USA
        Quod Me Nutrit Me Destruit

        Comment


        • [QUOTE]After all, Bush said "you're either with us or against us". [QUOTE]

          And you believe everything bush says?

          FYI Britain has offered to send in soldiers but America said they didn't need them and Germany has sent in 5000 soldiers into Afg.
          Man you are weird in the head! They don't help us in our massacre of Afghans so we should kill them? Then you complain about death threats against you? You just sent a death threat to around 1,000,000,000 people dumbass!
          Destruction is a lot easier than construction. The guy who operates a wrecking ball has a easier time than the architect who has to rebuild the house from the pieces.--- Immortal Wombat.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by paiktis22
            I have never seen a more ungrateful person especially against Britain

            Are you irish or something Wiglaf? Really...

            Blair has put to shame all the ancient romantics in his articulate speeches in support of the US...
            Why do you think the Irish hate the english??
            Alright some do but most just think of england as that country we're friends with that they used to go on holidays to when they were young.
            A few even think we should join the commonwealth Bertie even said it a few months back.
            Destruction is a lot easier than construction. The guy who operates a wrecking ball has a easier time than the architect who has to rebuild the house from the pieces.--- Immortal Wombat.

            Comment


            • I don't want anyone killed, Knight. What I do what, though, is a cancelled alliance, trade restrictions, and other serious economical screwovers. War, in a sense, but not really a declared one. I think we shouldn't exactly treat these lying nations like best buddies anymore. They've shown where their loyalties lie. Terrorism is a terrible thing, but Blair has done nothing politically challanging since September 11th. Nothing at all. He has blown away any and all moral code he once had, but I guess no one's counting over there. Not even the great BBC.

              And Mark, if we had a war, NO WAY would the British, Canadians, or Aussies win. NO WAY IN HELL. What are you smoking, really? I'm not talking about a WWIII type conflict, or a massive and drawn out campaign, but a small scale operation? No contest.

              Hey, you brought it up.

              Comment


              • [QUOTE]ANYTHING to get those rebel countries back in line.[QUOTE]


                OMFG you are the thickest most stupidly arrogant person I've ever known of. Are is this a joke? Are you some comedian or something?

                The world would be a better place if there were less Wiggies in it.

                Imagine if Wiggie got into power somehow? Oh wait that's Osama Bin Laden
                Destruction is a lot easier than construction. The guy who operates a wrecking ball has a easier time than the architect who has to rebuild the house from the pieces.--- Immortal Wombat.

                Comment


                • By all means, put a slash before the second quote tag next time. It helps the look.

                  The world would be a better place if there were less Wiggies in it.
                  Thanks for arguing, come back later.

                  Imagine if Wiggie got into power somehow? Oh wait that's Osama Bin Laden


                  that's an old one, buddy.

                  Comment


                  • This one

                    Originally posted by The Emperor Fabulous
                    RIGHT?! RIGHT?! YOURE RIGHT?!

                    Costing the lives of countless others because they won't help the United States?

                    Bringing us to a war that in no way the United States will survive (or, most likely, the world)?

                    Believing that justice is our allies suffering attacks from terrorists (BTW, they foiled plots over in Europe)?

                    Please answer me this: Why should we attack those who are causing us no harm in a war the the United States is PERFECTLY CAPABLE of handleing itself?

                    Oh, FYI, 6,000 British troops are being held out of Afghanistan by GEORGE W. BUSH. Also, there are Canadian, Japanese, British, and Australian ships in the Persian Gulf and the Indian Ocean. The Spanish, Italians, and Germans have uncovered numerous plots destined for completion both here and abroad.

                    Lets speculate, however, for the purposes of argument, that they weren't helping us in any way. Why shouldn't we attack our allies? Because it is POINTLESS! There is no reason to start a second war. There is no reason to have our friends become our enemies. There is no reason to destroy the world economy. There is no reason to attack a third party simply because we were the ones to be hurt by a second party. There is no reason to cost thousands, perhaps millions of lives. There is no reason for this thread to even exist, because it is a pointless troll to get people fired up.

                    Wiglaf and Bob, I have to congradulate you on both your stubborness and your arrogance. Your mothers should be proud.
                    "I predict your ignore will rival Ben's" - Ecofarm
                    ^ The Poly equivalent of:
                    "I hope you can see this 'cause I'm [flipping you off] as hard as I can" - Ignignokt the Mooninite

                    Comment


                    • - "Please answer me this: Why should we attack those who are causing us no harm in a war the the United States is PERFECTLY CAPABLE of handleing itself?" -

                      Blair said 9/11 did cause his country harm. He also pledged support to aid America. As this is a very costly and time consuming operation, I don't think anyone questions help would be nice. Not effective, as european ships and planes are godawful and behind the times, but what can you do.

                      - "Oh, FYI, 6,000 British troops are being held out of Afghanistan by GEORGE W. BUSH. Also, there are Canadian, Japanese, British, and Australian ships in the Persian Gulf and the Indian Ocean. " -

                      Politically, it'd be devastating for those troops to move in. The brits don't want this conflict. Blair knows as well as Bush that those troops are for show. Not for fighting. They probably couldn't be used if ordered to, anyway.

                      - "Lets speculate, however, for the purposes of argument, that they weren't helping us in any way. Why shouldn't we attack our allies? Because it is POINTLESS! There is no reason to start a second war. There is no reason to have our friends become our enemies. There is no reason to destroy the world economy. There is no reason to attack a third party simply because we were the ones to be hurt by a second party. There is no reason to cost thousands, perhaps millions of lives." -

                      It wouldn't be nuclear. It'd be a war like EF is against the Taliban: one on all fronts that minimized civilian casualties to zero and focused on economics, politics, nation building, etc.

                      Comment


                      • By all means, put a slash before the second quote tag next time. It helps the look.
                        I see from your last post you don't know how to yet.



                        I've just spent the last hour or more reading through this thread just for its entertainment But it's getting a bit old why not start something on " abolish education " maybe? If that happened you wouldn't have to go to kindergarden every day!
                        Destruction is a lot easier than construction. The guy who operates a wrecking ball has a easier time than the architect who has to rebuild the house from the pieces.--- Immortal Wombat.

                        Comment


                        • The insults just keep getting dumber, and dumber, and dumber, and dumber, and dumber and dumber...

                          YET ANOTHER (the third, for those keeping track) sign I've won. And another sign of the maturity and age of my opponents. I mean, Knight, really: what the hell was that?

                          Comment


                          • Junior Pinochet Wannabe,

                            Are you still here?

                            The only thing you've PROVEN to anybody is that you can hit the reply button more than anyone else.

                            The insults just keep getting dumber, and dumber, and dumber, and dumber, and dumber and dumber...
                            Yeah, like this one...

                            Thanks for arguing, come back later
                            We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X