God, I'm taking a look at ef's '95/'00 data and its a freaking (
) minefield due to the US population revisions.
OECD seems to do some "tweening" on the population figures, since their estimates of 1995 is 266.4M versus the Census Bureau's estimate for 1995 is 262.7M using the 1990 Census as a base.
There is a lot of things going on when the EU-15 numbers '95 v. '00 are disaggregated. Austria, Belgium, Germany, and France did poorly versus the US. Spain, the UK, Ireland, and the Netherlands all did well.
On an exchange rate basis, everybody got their hat handed to them, except Ireland, Mexico, the UK, Turkey, and central European countries. This would seem to make everybody feel like they're being left behind, when in actual fact, they're all treading water.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a262/5a2628f3ed33df8f05f720a168bb46c4b9e7b8d6" alt="Wink"
OECD seems to do some "tweening" on the population figures, since their estimates of 1995 is 266.4M versus the Census Bureau's estimate for 1995 is 262.7M using the 1990 Census as a base.
There is a lot of things going on when the EU-15 numbers '95 v. '00 are disaggregated. Austria, Belgium, Germany, and France did poorly versus the US. Spain, the UK, Ireland, and the Netherlands all did well.
On an exchange rate basis, everybody got their hat handed to them, except Ireland, Mexico, the UK, Turkey, and central European countries. This would seem to make everybody feel like they're being left behind, when in actual fact, they're all treading water.
Comment