If polygamy were common in your country, would you take a second spouse?

[General Ludd]

Originally posted by Sprayber
The potential for disaster is so present, that I dare not even think of what all would happen. Either there would be a constant conflict between the two women and the kids from each of them or (and far far worse) they would cooperate so well with each other that I would be hopelessly outnumbered.

What about another husband?

[Sprayber]

Originally posted by General Ludd



What about another husband?

We would just sit there and watch football all day and argue about whose turn it is to take out the trash.

[alva]

Hmmm, sounds better than 2 women though.

[alva]

Originally posted by chegitz guevara
It's not perverted. Perversion is something abnormal. It is not abnormal for men to desire more than one woman. Getting a hard-on from watching to chicks kissing is normal. Getting a hard-on from watching a chick dig in her nose is perverted.

kinky is using a feather to stroke the girls back gently.

Perverted is just simply f******* the chicken.

[Rex Little]

Hell, no! I wish I'd never married one. Bigamy is its own punishment.

[Whoha]

Re: If polygamy were common in your country, would you take a second spouse?

Originally posted by Jaguar
I definitely would. That way one of them could work and one could take care of my kids. I would have kids with both of them. An excellent family arrangement.

I live in America, Hell NO.

[muxec]

I could be a second husband. Or first out of two

[Skanky Burns]

Originally posted by KrazyHorse
You are out of your mind. Girls are jealous and insecure anyway. Could you imagine?

"Why don't you compliment how I look any more? Does she turn you on more than me? **** you. I'm divorcing you..."

Thats when you play them off against each other. Duh.

[Urban Ranger]

Originally posted by Skanky Burns
Thats when you play them off against each other. Duh.

It is completely dangerous to assume that they are dumber than you.

[JimmyCracksCorn]

Better idea: let your wife have a wife.

Then you only have to deal with one woman, but also get the benefit of watching her with other chicks and having occasional threesomes.

Just like having one wife, only with benefits

[Mr. Harley]

I know a "couple" where the lady of the house has both a husband and a wife. The wife has a child by a gay friend that is being raised by the lady of the house and her wife. The husband (he and the lady of the house had a child that died at age six, very tragic all around) has a girlfried who lives with all three who is a pseudo-submissive and has an additional boyfriend. She also has a child, by one of these two males. The kids seem fine, I gave up when I had to go 3-dimensional to figure out who is with who, when, and why (there are half a dozen other peripheal players as well). Oddly enough, there isn't really all that much sex going on beyond a normal marriage. Go figure.

[MRT144]

wait till an STD wipes them out

[Mr. Harley]

They've avoided that to. It is definitely not my style, but the kids are fine, and cherished, and I can think of a heck of alot of straight couples who don't treat their children as well.

[Imran Siddiqui]

it deffinately does not have to be multiple women to one man.

Well if there are only 3 people in the relationship it does (that's the definition of polygamy ). 2 men to one woman is polyandry and I'm not sure what a group of mixed would be, other than a Roman orgy .

[Skanky Burns]

Originally posted by Urban Ranger
It is completely dangerous to assume that they are dumber than you.

Make it a game rather than a competition. You win some, you lose some. As long as everyone is having fun...