Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ditch Dixie

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ditch Dixie



    whose with me?
    "Everything for the State, nothing against the State, nothing outside the State" - Benito Mussolini

  • #2
    We can keep playing these little games or we can deal with the real reason the far left isn't playing well in the south. We need to dump the extremists pushing to ban nativity scenes in public parks and instead focus on the message of getting better health care for all Americans and better educations for their children. The truth is you can't do anything unless you win elections.
    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

    Comment


    • #3
      (actually i think california should succeed by itself. who needs oregon? i mean really )
      "Everything for the State, nothing against the State, nothing outside the State" - Benito Mussolini

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Oerdin
        We can keep playing these little games or we can deal with the real reason the far left isn't playing well in the south. We need to dump the extremists pushing to ban nativity scenes in public parks and instead focus on the message of getting better health care for all Americans and better educations for their children. The truth is you can't do anything unless you win elections.
        You know, you say this in every thread, and I think you need to be called on this bullsh!t.

        40 years ago, the GOP ran Barry Goldwater for president and got trounced in one of the worst defeats in US history (the popular vote was more lopsided that either Nixon-McGovern or Reagan-Mondale, iirc). Triumphant liberals proudly claimed that America just wasn't that right-wing, that Republicans were extremists, that the liberal consensus was here to stay and the GOP needed to accommodate it.

        16 years later, Ronald Reagan was elected president. 8 years after that, Goldwater pronounced Reagan too conservative for his tastes.

        16 years after [i[that[/i], we have a Republican president so conservative that he's capable of horrifying Reaganites (see my sig, for example).

        Liberals don't have to moderate their "extremism," any more than the conservatives did. Instead, they need to imitate conservative tactics, and begin the hard work of moving from their ideologogy back from the margins to the center.
        "I have as much authority as the pope. I just don't have as many people who believe it." — George Carlin

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Rufus T. Firefly


          You know, you say this in every thread, and I think you need to be called on this bullsh!t.

          40 years ago, the GOP ran Barry Goldwater for president and got trounced in one of the worst defeats in US history (the popular vote was more lopsided that either Nixon-McGovern or Reagan-Mondale, iirc). Triumphant liberals proudly claimed that America just wasn't that right-wing, that Republicans were extremists, that the liberal consensus was here to stay and the GOP needed to accommodate it.

          16 years later, Ronald Reagan was elected president. 8 years after that, Goldwater pronounced Reagan too conservative for his tastes.

          16 years after [i[that[/i], we have a Republican president so conservative that he's capable of horrifying Reaganites (see my sig, for example).

          Liberals don't have to moderate their "extremism," any more than the conservatives did. Instead, they need to imitate conservative tactics, and begin the hard work of moving from their ideologogy back from the margins to the center.
          Um, isn't Oerdin's point that the Dems need to begin the hard work of moving their ideology back from the margins to the center? I don't find your point clear as stated.
          He's got the Midas touch.
          But he touched it too much!
          Hey Goldmember, Hey Goldmember!

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Sikander


            Um, isn't Oerdin's point that the Dems need to begin the hard work of moving their ideology back from the margins to the center? I don't find your point clear as stated.
            No, he thinks the Dems need to change ideology, not move it -- and he's wrong. The GOP didn't change their ideology -- if they did, Reagan would be an amusing footnote and we'd all fondly remember President Rockefeller. Instead they built coalitions that connected their formerly-marginal ideology to people beyond the narrow realm of the true believers. That's the tactic that liberals need to emulate. Don't abandon the ideology, and don't apologize for it; instead, do the hard work of showing people why it's right for them. Conservatives did this very, very well, and their example can be followed.
            "I have as much authority as the pope. I just don't have as many people who believe it." — George Carlin

            Comment


            • #7
              However, the GOP did change its ideology. Maybe Reagan didn't change his own, but the party is different ideologically than in Nixon's day, for instance.
              I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

              Comment


              • #8
                Yes...it sure did!

                Sadly, not for the better.



                -=Vel=-
                The list of published books grows. If you're curious to see what sort of stories I weave out, head to Amazon.com and do an author search for "Christopher Hartpence." Help support Candle'Bre, a game created by gamers FOR gamers. All proceeds from my published works go directly to the project.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Lawrence of Arabia
                  (actually i think california should succeed by itself. who needs oregon? i mean really )

                  "secede" -- not "succeed"
                  A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Oh, btw, the article is ridiculous. Some of the reddest of red states aren't part of Dixie. In fact, the reddest state had marriage norms dictated to it from the federal government. And those norms were religiously based!

                    Sadly, not for the better.
                    There are a lot of big issues around now that weren't around then. It's a different political landscape.
                    I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I'm starting to get embarrassed for some of the Dems here. I've seen 4 year olds take things better than some of ya'll have. I really really hope the Democratic party will listen to the people like Oerdin or Mr. Fun who seem to at least see the troubles in the Democratic party. I haven't been able to vote for a Democrat in years and before too long I may not be able to vote for a Republican.
                      Which side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We are evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that. --Saul Tigh

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        what the hell are "nativity scenes" and do the have something to do with having sex in the woods?
                        urgh.NSFW

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I'm really torn between Oerdin & Rufus' arguements. Each make sense.

                          I guess the question for those who see it the way Rufus does is this: what conservative tactics are you talking about emulating?

                          -Arrian
                          grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

                          The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            You hear echoes of Southern nationalism whenever Mississippi invokes "states' rights" to justify flying the Confederate flag over their capitols
                            We usually appeal to democratic ideals given the referendum we had on the matter. But why let facts get in the way of a good rant.
                            I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                            For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Arrian
                              I'm really torn between Oerdin & Rufus' arguements. Each make sense.

                              I guess the question for those who see it the way Rufus does is this: what conservative tactics are you talking about emulating?

                              -Arrian
                              I suppose it depends on what you want the Party to be like. What do you personally feel the party should be.
                              Which side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We are evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that. --Saul Tigh

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X