Ned,
To your first point: Yes, Shrub got the green light from Congress to go to war, and he did so disingenuously, with slim, and largely manufactured "evidence" about WoMD....none of which have been found in Iraq.
Oops.
As the person seated in the land's highest office, and arguably the most powerful position on the planet. With full satellite coverage of the country in question, with access to world class intelligence file, the conclusion here is inescapable. He WANTED a war with Iraq, and was so hell-bent on getting one that he saw no problem with a little creative manufacture of "evidence" to sway the people. This is wrong. It is far, FAR removed from the aforementioned "moral high ground" NO MATTER WHAT KIND OF AZZ that S. Hussein was while in power. There's a right way and a wrong way to go about things. His father's way was a good example of the right way. His was...great example of the wrong way.
As to Kerry's actions...I don't pretend to know, nor are they relevant to my position that the sitting president and his croonies have what I fear is an outright *evil*, poisonous agenda that will do great harm to this country.
As to your second point, the rebublicans have not hid the reasons behind the "nuclear option." They have made their intentions and the reasons behind them quite transparent. Again, this IS NOT democracy in action. This is nothing more than a bald play for power and it goes against EVERYTHING the founding fathers stood for.
I am ashamed on their behalf, for the proposed behavior of men who should know better AND who would, in the same breath, pretend to be upholding democratic ideals.
-=Vel=-
To your first point: Yes, Shrub got the green light from Congress to go to war, and he did so disingenuously, with slim, and largely manufactured "evidence" about WoMD....none of which have been found in Iraq.
Oops.
As the person seated in the land's highest office, and arguably the most powerful position on the planet. With full satellite coverage of the country in question, with access to world class intelligence file, the conclusion here is inescapable. He WANTED a war with Iraq, and was so hell-bent on getting one that he saw no problem with a little creative manufacture of "evidence" to sway the people. This is wrong. It is far, FAR removed from the aforementioned "moral high ground" NO MATTER WHAT KIND OF AZZ that S. Hussein was while in power. There's a right way and a wrong way to go about things. His father's way was a good example of the right way. His was...great example of the wrong way.
As to Kerry's actions...I don't pretend to know, nor are they relevant to my position that the sitting president and his croonies have what I fear is an outright *evil*, poisonous agenda that will do great harm to this country.
As to your second point, the rebublicans have not hid the reasons behind the "nuclear option." They have made their intentions and the reasons behind them quite transparent. Again, this IS NOT democracy in action. This is nothing more than a bald play for power and it goes against EVERYTHING the founding fathers stood for.
I am ashamed on their behalf, for the proposed behavior of men who should know better AND who would, in the same breath, pretend to be upholding democratic ideals.
-=Vel=-
Comment