Originally posted by JohnT
Jane Smiley is no F. Scott Fitzgerald. And this isn't the 1920s, where a mere fraction of the print that is generated today was made.
At that time, being a New York Times bestseller meant something. Nowadays, people like Dilbert, Oprah, and the season 1 Survivor gang are all New York Times best-selling authors.
So.... who cares? The fact that she's a NYT best-selling author doesn't really mean **** anymore.
Jane Smiley is no F. Scott Fitzgerald. And this isn't the 1920s, where a mere fraction of the print that is generated today was made.
At that time, being a New York Times bestseller meant something. Nowadays, people like Dilbert, Oprah, and the season 1 Survivor gang are all New York Times best-selling authors.
So.... who cares? The fact that she's a NYT best-selling author doesn't really mean **** anymore.
'Cause, see, that's where we get back to this "ignorance" thing...

The stupidity of that statement is just mind boggling. One could vote for David Duke for the same reasoning. Hell, you could vote for me for the same reason. I don't like what he'll do, but at least he'll do it????
Comment