A Former REPUBLICAN Senator for Kerry!

[Wiglaf]

And while we're on the subject of fear, Kuciwalker, I think I need to make a comment on the liberal pseudo-intellect here. You are terrified that we are losing troops in Iraq, that we are there. The beheadings, the rocket attacks, and the IED's going off daily do not strike you as the products of a fundamentalist cult of hatred but instead as the result of a somehow rational Iraqi reaction to the removal of one of the most vile dictators in the world.

You and John Kerry believe that, without a smoking gun, we have no reason to suspect nations composed of such individuals. You say we have no reason to depose, in a post-9/11 environment, a nation that toys with international law, bribes international institutions, attempts to assassinate presidents, gasses its own people and, when threatened with certain destruction, cannot explain where the weapons to create those gasses went.

Let the system work its way up until the next 9/11, or until Libya supplies terrorists with biological weapons. That's something to be afraid of.

[Jaguar]

Originally posted by Ted Striker


Republicans for Kerry.

Ted Striker predicted months ago that the phenomenon of "Reagan Democrats" is going to occur here with "Kerry Republicans.:

That parallel isn't exact. There were Reagan Democrats for two reasons:
1. Carter was an idiot
2. Reagan was awesome

Kerry Republicans only exist because:
1. Bush is an idiot

[Agathon]

...the liberal pseudo-intellect here...

[Wiglaf]

1. Bush is an idiot

Again we see the liberal pseudo-intellect.

[Jaguar]

w00t! I'm to the left of Wiglaf!

[Wiglaf]

Is this the best you can do to justify a vote for Kerry? Dance and pretend to be smart?

[Ted Striker]

Wiglaf,

If you had to take your pick, which conservative want to hit it with the most?

[Jaguar]

Where did you get the idea that I'm voting for Kerry?


/me continues to dance about being to the left of Wiglaf

[Wiglaf]

Since you're an idiot I'll respond to your signature.

"I actually view them as extreme, and I think their policies have been extreme, and that extends all the way to Iraq, where this president, in my judgment, diverted the real war on terror -- which was Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda -- and almost obsessively moved to deal with Iraq in a way that weakened our nation, overextended our armed forces, cost us $200 billion and created a breach in our oldest alliances." Senator John Kerry

And while we're on the subject of fear, Kerry boy, I think I need to make a comment on the liberal pseudo-intellect here. You are terrified that we are losing troops in Iraq, that we are there. The beheadings, the rocket attacks, and the IED's going off daily do not strike you as the products of a fundamentalist cult of hatred but instead as the result of a somehow rational Iraqi reaction to the removal of one of the most vile dictators in the world.

You and John Kerry believe that, without a smoking gun, we have no reason to suspect nations composed of such individuals. You say we have no reason to depose, in a post-9/11 environment, a nation that toys with international law, bribes international institutions, attempts to assassinate presidents, gasses its own people and, when threatened with certain destruction, cannot explain where the weapons to create those gasses went.

Let the system work its way up until the next 9/11, or until Libya supplies terrorists with biological weapons. That's something to be afraid of.

[Nubclear]

Wiglaf is a commie in disguise.

[Agathon]

Your liberal pseudo intellect is showing, Jag.

BTW, WTF does that mean?

[Jaguar]

If enough Republicans ditch Bush, Hasslehoff returns!

[Wiglaf]

Liberal pseudo-intellect = dangerous idealism in the hands of the uneducated but conceited.

[Agathon]

And if Bush wins, you will be sporting an avatar that will make you the laughingstock of Apolyton.

In fact, I've decided that should I win, I will start a "Design Jaguar's humiliating new avatar" thread. I'm sure I'll get many takers.

[Agathon]

Originally posted by Wiglaf
Liberal pseudo-intellect = dangerous idealism in the hands of the uneducated but conceited.

That's not a very good definition. Some Xtian fundamentalists would satisfy that definition, yet are hardly liberal.