ned, you still haven't explained why rummy should be held blameless for the debacle of dismantling the iraqi army.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How Bremer screwed up in Iraq
Collapse
X
-
I have no quibble. The point I was trying to make is that Bush would not have gone after Saddam without an UN resolution.Originally posted by germanos
I have no problem supporting your point
.
However, I have the feeling your point is the UN wouldn't support an invasion of Iraq because France is an ass, while in fact the UN wouldn't have supported such an invasion since it is against the UN-charter itself.http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en
Comment
-
Papa Bush wouldn't. And he is the wiser man for it."post reported"Winston, on the barricades for freedom of speech
"I don't like laws all over the world. Doesn't mean I am going to do anything but post about it."Jon Miller
Comment
-
Pretty much the same thing. France has been saying this since de GaulleOriginally posted by MikeH
All UN member see looking after their own interests as their primary foriegn policy objective.http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en
Comment
-
Unless he had some veto power over Bremer, which he didn't, I have no idea why he should be held responsible at all.Originally posted by Q Cubed
ned, you still haven't explained why rummy should be held blameless for the debacle of dismantling the iraqi army.http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en
Comment
-
I'm not sure even Bush II would have gone after Saddam in 1991. It took the violation of 17 resolutions and Saddam's constant resistance to teach us that he never would cooperate with the international community. We didn't know that in 1991.Originally posted by germanos
Papa Bush wouldn't. And he is the wiser man for it.http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en
Comment
-
Bremer was a subordinate of the President of the United States. Dear Leader had a veto if he disagreed with Bremer's policies.
In any case, Defense was strongly for the disbanding of the army. As I said earlier, Feith was probably the pointman."Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
-Bokonon
Comment
-
President.Originally posted by Sava
the buck stops _______
Ned,
Any credit or blame in Iraq goes to the person that decided we should go there.
I don't understand why you care so much for Rumsfeld, Bush, and Cheney and not at all for the american people and soldiers.What can make a nigga wanna fight a whole night club/Figure that he ought to maybe be a pimp simply 'cause he don't like love/What can make a nigga wanna achy, break all rules/In a book when it took a lot to get you hooked up to this volume/
What can make a nigga wanna loose all faith in/Anything that he can't feel through his chest wit sensation
Comment
-
The following was taken from a Times article last December. It doesn't seem to be consistent with the NYTimes article which lays the blame squarely on Bremer just as the White House does in the Times piece. Are Wolfowitz and Feith speaking out of school since the commanders in Iraq and the Joint Chiefs had a different view?Originally posted by Ramo
Bremer was a subordinate of the President of the United States. Dear Leader had a veto if he disagreed with Bremer's policies.
In any case, Defense was strongly for the disbanding of the army. As I said earlier, Feith was probably the pointman.
"Pentagon Civilian Close to Rumsfeld: "We Shouldn't Have Disbanded the (Iraqi) Army": White House aides finger Coalition Provisional Authority Administrator L. Paul Bremer for disbanding the Iraqi army. Bremer aide Walter Slocombe claims some responsibility, but it's unlikely that a Clinton-era Democrat like Slocombe would have been allowed to make such a big decision. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz says the decision to disband the army was unanimous. Asked whether it was Rumsfeld’s call, Douglas Feith, a top Rumsfeld aide, says, "You could say that." A Pentagon civilian close to Rumsfeld admits, "We shouldn't have disbanded the army."http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en
Comment
-
I thought the decision to disband the Army was a mistake. I really want the person responsible clearly identified and fired. Most, but not all, of the evidence is point straight at Bremer. However, Wolfowitz and Feith seem to take some credit and suggest that the final call was Rumsfeld.Originally posted by Pax
President.
Ned,
Any credit or blame in Iraq goes to the person that decided we should go there.
I don't understand why you care so much for Rumsfeld, Bush, and Cheney and not at all for the american people and soldiers.
I think Rummy ought to go if this was in fact his decision.http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en
Comment
Comment