Personally I don't buy this bull****.
The US is practically running Iraq right now and they have a multitude of ways to affect the outcome of any coming elections. Barring sattelite TV, they decide what the media in Iraq will say. They will decide which parts of the country are "safe enough" to hold elections. They will decide which of the candidates are "legal" to participate. Their admiistration and the subcontractors they totally control are the main employers in Iraq and thus they have the power to coerce a large numbe rof people to vote "accordingly". Plus, who the hell in Iraq is going to check where each candidate gets their funds from?
So why need a covert CIA operation in order to just provide funding to a couple of candidates? And how come this is the first time such a plan is disclosed to the public? Does this mean that in past elections in foreign countries (in Venezuela f.e.) the CIA did not make any plans to rig the elections? How come no such plans were ever disclosed? Does this mean that in that and in many other cases where it is concievable, the CIA actually implemented such plans and that's why nothing was disclosed? From an intelligence point of view, such disclosures are catastrophically bad practice, so they wouldn't happen unless another purpose would be served.
IMO, that purpose is just a sham effort to lead the public opinion (chiefly in the USA, since nobody in Iraq or the rest of the world is THAT daft) away from the evident fact that no democratic elections can be held in Iraq, as long as the USA is occupying the country. CIA or no CIA, the elections will be rigged, otherwise, the occupation cannot be continued.
The US is practically running Iraq right now and they have a multitude of ways to affect the outcome of any coming elections. Barring sattelite TV, they decide what the media in Iraq will say. They will decide which parts of the country are "safe enough" to hold elections. They will decide which of the candidates are "legal" to participate. Their admiistration and the subcontractors they totally control are the main employers in Iraq and thus they have the power to coerce a large numbe rof people to vote "accordingly". Plus, who the hell in Iraq is going to check where each candidate gets their funds from?
So why need a covert CIA operation in order to just provide funding to a couple of candidates? And how come this is the first time such a plan is disclosed to the public? Does this mean that in past elections in foreign countries (in Venezuela f.e.) the CIA did not make any plans to rig the elections? How come no such plans were ever disclosed? Does this mean that in that and in many other cases where it is concievable, the CIA actually implemented such plans and that's why nothing was disclosed? From an intelligence point of view, such disclosures are catastrophically bad practice, so they wouldn't happen unless another purpose would be served.
IMO, that purpose is just a sham effort to lead the public opinion (chiefly in the USA, since nobody in Iraq or the rest of the world is THAT daft) away from the evident fact that no democratic elections can be held in Iraq, as long as the USA is occupying the country. CIA or no CIA, the elections will be rigged, otherwise, the occupation cannot be continued.

Comment