Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Terrifying

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Well alpha-emitters aren't a problem - alpha radiation is easily attenuated. However it is a significant problem when ingested...
    Speaking of Erith:

    "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

    Comment


    • Yep, you end up burping helium for ages.
      One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

      Comment




      • btw,

        Did anyone ask the question why the radiation comes particularly in the shape of He-4 nuclei, and nothing else?
        urgh.NSFW

        Comment


        • Should I attach a p-n chart?

          I'm sure the derivatives decay as beta and gamma.
          One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

          Comment


          • Well I can't vouch for what the decay products are going to do, of course...
            Speaking of Erith:

            "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Azazel


              btw,

              Did anyone ask the question why the radiation comes particularly in the shape of He-4 nuclei, and nothing else?
              I think it is just a particularly stable nuclide...
              Speaking of Erith:

              "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

              Comment


              • Should I attach a p-n chart?

                I realize it's a chart with protons and neutrons, but what is it?

                I'm sure the derivatives decay as beta and gamma.

                Not really.
                urgh.NSFW

                Comment


                • I think some of those steps may also result in gamma emission too...
                  Speaking of Erith:

                  "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

                  Comment


                  • well of course, but It's a long way down to.... you guessed it, LEAD.

                    Anyway, this is a real interesting thing I noted: DU starts getting dangerous, but only after thousands of years...
                    urgh.NSFW

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Azazel
                      Should I attach a p-n chart?

                      I realize it's a chart with protons and neutrons, but what is it?


                      Its a chart showing how atoms will decay, as they attempt to reach the stable corridor on the proton-neutron graph. Too many neutrons - beta decay, too many protons - alpha decay


                      I'm sure the derivatives decay as beta and gamma.

                      Not really.
                      http://www.antenna.nl/wise/uranium/rup.html
                      Sorry, I'm refering to decay chains and their derivatives.

                      One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                      Comment




                      • Its a chart showing how atoms will decay, as they attempt to reach the stable corridor on the proton-neutron graph. Too many neutrons - beta decay, too many protons - alpha decay

                        Interesting.... still, you haven't answered my question: Why the rigidity, why Just He-4, and no H, or D, or T, or He-3? I mean, it would make much more sense to eject an He-3 to balance the "excess protons".
                        urgh.NSFW

                        Comment


                        • But the problem with DU is that people actually DIE and get ILL because of it. There is alot of proof about this. The only ones that deny it are the weapons manufacturers and the US government.

                          And please stop saying that DU must be proven to be dangerous in order to get banned; when lives are at stake, it is the assumed safety that must be put under trial, not the assumed danger.

                          As for the Greek jails, we are not used to incarcerate people indefinitely without trial, like you do in Guantanamo, at least not since the (US-supported) dictatorship fell. And of course we don't play perverse pshychological games with our prisoners, like you do in Abu Ghraib. And btw, the death penalty was abolished here 30 years ago.

                          Still we don't claim to be the champions of the free world.
                          "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
                          George Orwell

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Azazel


                            Its a chart showing how atoms will decay, as they attempt to reach the stable corridor on the proton-neutron graph. Too many neutrons - beta decay, too many protons - alpha decay

                            Interesting.... still, you haven't answered my question: Why the rigidity, why Just He-4, and no H, or D, or T, or He-3? I mean, it would make much more sense to eject an He-3 to balance the "excess protons".
                            Oh, with you now.

                            It has to do with the stability of He-4 and the energy equation. He-4 requires less energy to create compared with He-3 or H , D or T. As you fill up a cup it leaks out of the lowest hole as it were.
                            One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                            Comment


                            • Yes, this is true, but this is not really a correct comparison. If the creation energies are different, that would just mean that the rates of creation are different ( Or so it is in chem. kinetics.... )
                              urgh.NSFW

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Azazel
                                Yes, this is true, but this is not really a correct comparison. If the creation energies are different, that would just mean that the rates of creation are different ( Or so it is in chem. kinetics.... )
                                The gaps between energy levels are vastly different, tens and hundreds of MeV's against eV's or maybe keV's. You probably could compare rates of creation but you'd find that the ratios are so incomparable that its just not worth considering.
                                One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X