True or False - Democrats Care About Troops??

[Wiglaf]

Say you are the President, and you want to invade a country because their dictator just nuked America or something evil like that.

He had 200 000 troops and your advisors were all like, we need at least 2 million to take it. We'll have about 300 000 casualties.

If each troop costs $100/5 months, then you must pay $200 000 000 over a five month period to do this. But you don't have any money. You have $0.

Naturally, you can't go to war, according to liberals, otherwise we're talking debt. So no war.

BUT

What if we have the money. Then, liberals would want war. So -

Conclusion: Liberals reduce troops to dollar signs when they try to criticize George Bush. This, of course, is intolerable, and an outrage.

Can ANYONE answer to this? I asked my former social studies prof and he told me I was "ahead of my time." He said he'd get back to me but has not yet, so here I am.

[Nubclear]

OMFG THOSE EVIL LIBERALS!!11

[asleepathewheel]

WTF is a "social studies prof"?

and please tell me what college that was so my offspring can avoid it.

[Dis]

true in most cases.

But I think most hard core commies and pinko liberals do not.

[Nubclear]

Why, I hate our troops I hope they all drowned in the blood of the capitalists
I hate America and freedom, and good Glory to Satan!

[GePap]

Wow, what an utterly pathetic troll. But its Wiglaf, so what is new?

I particularly love the magically low numbers, the stupid set up (dictator nuked us-which in the real world would equal a nuclear retaliation, and hardly anything left of the other country to take) and the utter disregard of the actual position of the other side.

Can ANYONE answer to this? I asked my former social studies prof and he told me I was "ahead of my time." He said he'd get back to me but has not yet, so here I am.

Oh, so being "ahead of my my time" has become the new "special"

[Wiglaf]

Listen to me. Bush went to war and went into debt. Clearly he did not give any craps about the almighty dollar. John Kerry seems only to complain when we lose money. Not troops.

Focus on the analysis, not me. The numbers do not lie, they never do. (~Ryan Sandburg IIRC)

[jdd2007]

I dont even know wtf you're talking about.

[GePap]

Originally posted by Wiglaf
Listen to me. Bush went to war and went into debt. Clearly he did not give any craps about the almighty dollar. John Kerry seems only to complain when we lose money. Not troops.

Listen to me: Bush CUT TAXES prior and WENT INTO DEFICIT SPENDING PRIOR TO GOING TO WAR. IN FACT, THE BULK OF THE DEFICIT CAN BE TRACED TO THE TAX CUTS AND INCREASED INTERNAL SPENDING. Now, get your head out of your ass and come back to reality.

Oh, and if Bush cares so deeply for the troops, explain his CUTS into veteran benefits, hazard pay, aide ot military families, etc. etc. etc.

[Wiglaf]

The war cost more money than any of Bush's other policies. Face facts.

Oh, and if Bush cares so deeply for the troops, explain his CUTS into veteran benefits, hazard pay, aide ot military families, etc. etc. etc.

They are not in battle! Who would you rather support, when push comes to shove? Or, take the John Kerry route. Both

edit - or rather promise both, deliver nothing.

[GePap]

Originally posted by Wiglaf
The war cost more money than any of Bush's other policies. Face facts.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

This single, simple statement shows the depth of your ignorance, and pretty much the source of your "arguement"

Bush has asked congress for one 125 billion dollar procurement for the war, then 87 billion more, and even with war costs higher than expected, the most the US has spent in Iraq since before we invaded is about 350 billion.

The first Bush tax cut cost the state over 1 trillion.

Can you understand which number is bigger?

The old people!? They are not in battle! Who would you rather support, when push comes to shove? Or, take the John Kerry route. Both

"old people"? So first you showcase your ignorance one way, then you do it another way.

Sad.

[JohnT]

If somebody set off a nuke in the US, the Dems would have no choice but to retaliate... the populace would demand it.

What a bizarre hypothesis, followed by an even more bizarre conclusion.

[Nubclear]

JohnT, do you hate the troops or something?

[The Emperor Fabulous]

The numbers do not lie, they never do. (~Ryan Sandburg IIRC)

The Chicago Cubs player? He was AWESOME!

(The seriousness of my reply indicates my attitude towards this thread)

[Ted Striker]

Shawn Dunston PWNZ