Originally posted by Solver
Does not. Not when you examine a couple of facts as a whole, that do not make the traditional explanation a plausible one.
But it still violates Occam's (Ockham's) razor by adding an element totally unnecessary to the process. Given that Egyptian pyramid building is something that can be learned in children's books, the addition of aliens to the process is little more than wishful thinking
Does not. Not when you examine a couple of facts as a whole, that do not make the traditional explanation a plausible one.
All "evidence" put forth re: aliens and the Pyramids rely entirely upon the assumption that "If I don't know how they did it, then they couldn't have done it." When you get to the ravings of people like Van Daniken, then you get to add the despicable element of cultural/racial superiority. I remember reading Chariots of the Gods about 20 years ago and coming away impressed about how many S. American cultures were advanced enough to do what Van Daniken says that were capable of doing, and, conversely, how many African cultures were not capable of doing what Van Daniken said they couldn't.

Comment