Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Shields Up!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Shields Up!

    After tens of billions spent in tests over the past two decades, the missile defense shield just got its first interceptor in Alaska.

    Don't you feel safe?

    Dulles VA (SPX) Jul 26, 2004 - Orbital Sciences Corporation announced that it supplied the first interceptor boost vehicle for the U.S. Missile Defense Agency (MDA)'s Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) system that was installed into an underground silo at Fort Greely, Alaska yesterday, July 22, 2004.
    I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

  • #2
    Shee-it... they could've given me a mere 100 million and I would've chased down some missiles myself.
    I'm consitently stupid- Japher
    I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- Ned

    Comment


    • #3
      I like your sig near the avatar, Thebes.
      urgh.NSFW

      Comment


      • #4
        Let's hope no-one in the world has more than 20 missiles... and the hit rate is 100%.

        What a waste of money.
        Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
        Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
        We've got both kinds

        Comment


        • #5
          Why are you being so pessimistic, MikeH? don't you realize that this means that Osama can't launch his ICBMs anymore?
          urgh.NSFW

          Comment


          • #6
            The patriot missiles have consistently improved over the last 20 years. I have no reason to believe that the missile shield will not improve in like fashion.
            I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

            Comment


            • #7
              How many missiles do they think Kim will have by the end of next year?

              BTW is "robust test program" still shorthand for "it doesn't work properly but we'll fire a few off and claim it exceeds specifications anyway"?
              Never give an AI an even break.

              Comment


              • #8
                Yeah, but the PAC-3 is madly expensive. Some guys here are developing a cheaper guidance system that would be just as useful.
                urgh.NSFW

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by DanS
                  The patriot missiles have consistently improved over the last 20 years.
                  Tell that to the relatives of the RAF Tornado crew shot down by a patriot battery over Iraq.
                  Never give an AI an even break.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    All of this crap is madly expensive, Azazel. Why should PAC-3 or the missile shield be any different?
                    I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Tell that to the relatives of the RAF Tornado crew shot down by a patriot battery over Iraq.
                      Nothing is ever 100% in this business. I think you know this.
                      I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        All of this crap is madly expensive, Azazel. Why should PAC-3 or the missile shield be any different?

                        Replace the word 'crap' with 'pork', and you're realize why it is.

                        for example, the Nautilus Tactical laser will cost 4-8k per shot, instead of the millions per a Patriot PAC3 missile.

                        The Arrow ABM cost the USA only a billion USD to develop, and I presume a similar amount was spent by Israel. So that's 2 billion for that threat. This is TENS of billions of dollars.
                        urgh.NSFW

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by DanS
                          The patriot missiles have consistently improved over the last 20 years. I have no reason to believe that the missile shield will not improve in like fashion.
                          And this "shield" against a virtually non-existent threat cost how many additional Army and Marine divisions we could have been using to hunt down and kill real enemies with real capabilities?

                          So the missile shield improves - anyone who nukes us will have to use another delivery method.
                          When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by CerberusIV


                            Tell that to the relatives of the RAF Tornado crew shot down by a patriot battery over Iraq.
                            The missile hit the target selected for it, did it not?
                            When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

                            Comment


                            • #15

                              And this "shield" against a virtually non-existent threat cost how many additional Army and Marine divisions we could have been using to hunt down and kill real enemies with real capabilities?

                              So the missile shield improves - anyone who nukes us will have to use another delivery method.


                              That's the most important part. The sky is the last place you should be looking for your incoming nukes.
                              urgh.NSFW

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X