Moore is at it again (lying as usual)

[molly bloom]

Originally posted by DinoDoc
We've already had that copy paste war but thanks for playing molly.

[DinoDoc]

/me pats molly on the head and gives him a cookie.

[molly bloom]

Originally posted by DinoDoc
* DinoDoc pats molly on the head and gives him a cookie.

molly pities DinoDoc for his lack of originality.

[GePap]

Originally posted by Ted Striker


I called Moore an idiot.

Chegitz quoted it and said, "like you."


Of course he used the Moore approach and added some other stuff in with the same that way plausible deniability is easily used.

"What? I didn't say that..."

Actually, NO. See, the sad part is you add a picture of the whole exchange, and on this very page even!

You called Moore and idiot. Then you have a second line saying: he makes stuff out of thin air.

Che replied with one line only : You mean like you?

Now, maybe its a problem of english comprehension, but Che could be refering to either statement..or both perhaps. Though one wonders given your construction, if you are calling Moore and idiot becuase he makes stuff out of this air, by which point Che has every right to question whether you are any different in the making stuff up out of this air category-and the idiot comment is just your own definition coming back at you.

Thoguht of course, it was you Ted who began the name calling even thought it was to a third party, so its hard to have any sympathy for you when it gets thrown back at you. Your attacks of even more people as a response seems only to weaken the notion of you as a victim of anything in any way.

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by molly bloom


molly pities DinoDoc for his lack of originality.

It isn't needed if the subject bites at the smallest effort.

[molly bloom]

Originally posted by DinoDoc
It isn't needed if the subject bites at the smallest effort.

Your response to my first post was entirely superfluous, adding nothing.

Now you continue to add less.

Replying to you gave me a respite from trimming my toenails.

It's not as if it required a great deal of effort, after all.

[Ted Striker]

Originally posted by GePap


Now, maybe its a problem of english comprehension, but Che could be refering to either statement..or both perhaps.

Or the first.

Exactly my point.

Thoguht of course, it was you Ted who began the name calling even thought it was to a third party, so its hard to have any sympathy for you when it gets thrown back at you. Your attacks of even more people as a response seems only to weaken the notion of you as a victim of anything in any way.

Ted doesn't care what you think, doesn't want anybody's sympathy, and doesn't claim being a victim, and in fact takes your failed shots at him as a badge of honor. Secondly Chegitz has a history of namecalling so it's hard to take his claims of justice seriously.

So there!

By the way I am proud that my your momma joke has had such a profound effect on you guys.

[GePap]

Originally posted by Ted Striker


Or the first.

Exactly my point.



Ted doesn't care what you think, doesn't want anybody's sympathy, and doesn't claim being a victim, and in fact takes your failed shots at him as a badge of honor. Secondly Chegitz has a history of namecalling so it's hard to take his claims of justice seriously.

So there!

By the way I am proud that my your momma joke has had such a profound effect on you guys.

And given your spotless record on the matter-OH< WAIT.

As for "exactly my point"- so all you have is that "Maybe" he did. Yet you stated it as fact, that he DID.

Moore would be proud of you Ted, you know just how to spin them

[Ted Striker]

I never claimed I had a spotless record.

[Ted Striker]

Originally posted by GePap

Yet you stated it as fact, that he DID.

And yep, he did it, there is no maybe about it.

[GePap]

Lets look at the facts

Ted said:

Moore is an idiot

He just makes things out of nowhere

Che replied:

You mean like you?

Those are the facts. Now, this is a question of Che's intent. Only Che knows the truth. But of course, he could always lie to us.

Interestingly, people need a way to understand and interpret the behaviors of others. The most common way is to superimpose their own intentions and manners on the actions of others.

For example, when I saw this exchange, I believed Che was obviously refering to the second line. Why?

The first line is Ted's opinion of Moore. Who besides Ted gives a rat's ass about his opinion of Moore? That and a nickle gives me 5 cents.

The second line though is a claim that happens to be on-topic, since the thread began with fez calling Moore a liar, and so is Ted doing here.

If I were in this position, not caring about Ted's opinion of Moore, would be responding to his alegation that Moore invents things-since by doing so I would be charging Ted with hypocrasy.

Faced with the same need to interpret the exchange, Ted decides that Che's intent must be to call him an idiot, and not a hypocrite.

That says much about Ted, now doesn;t it?

[Ted Striker]

That's nice.

[GePap]

Originally posted by Ted Striker
That's nice.

Yup, Glad you agree

[Ted Striker]

not really

[GePap]

Not surprised, but then it was aimed at third parties, and not the two participants.