Clinton Back's Bush's War in Iraq

[Harry Tuttle]

Originally posted by General Ludd


I hope you realise that I was refering to Clinton's support (even if it is half-heated) as being another strike against the war.

Hey I didn't vote for the guy...

[Urban Ranger]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
The fact that they tried to portray the 9/11 commision's report as a refutation of the adminstration's claims that there were ties between Iraq and Al Qaeda, even after the members of the administration and members of the 9/11 commision itself said that the report did no such thing and questioned how the media could come to such a conclusion.

Cite?

[Spiffor]

Bush gets support from Putin... He gets support from Clinton... With such people supporting Bush, I guess any upstanding American Republican Patriot just has to vote for anyone but Bush then

[Kuciwalker]

And go against the Lord God Putin?

[Seeker]

"That's why I supported the Iraq thing. There was a lot of stuff unaccounted for"

ah, I missed Mister Articulation....truly the voice of a generation...

And of course remember Clinton invaded more countries than Bush has. But he was 'good' and Bush is 'evil'.

[The Emperor Fabulous]

I shudder to think about the invasions of a second Bush term.

Also, Clinton's invasions didn't involve the massive amount of troops and reservists that Iraq and Afghanistan have.

[Urban Ranger]

Still no citations from Drake.

[Drake Tungsten]

I posted the article on another thread days ago. If you missed it, that's your problem.

edit: Here it is, in your own thread, no less...

[GePap]

for Cut and Paste Man: it seem, much like cutting and pasting, he is stuck with repetavive posts.

As for Clinton- he was always hawkish on Iraq, and probalby would have moved to invade Iraq in '98 if it weren't for the impeachment. He openly backed the invasion before the war- so why on earth is this a surprise to anyone? The bigger "news", if this is news at all, is Clinton's criticism of the timing, which is new. Though it isn't really newsworthy.

Oh, on Media distortion, no one beats FoxNews.

[Drake Tungsten]

for Cut and Paste Man: it seem, much like cutting and pasting, he is stuck with repetavive posts.

Yeah, like I'm really going to waste my time finding a brand-new article to cure UR's ignorance when a perfectly good one is just sitting there...

[GePap]

Like I said before, the great fault of cutting and pasting is, well, lack of substance.

Go ahead and post the same unsubstantiated article all you want- it will get left behind in the dust arguement wise.

[Drake Tungsten]

Go ahead and post the same unsubstantiated article all you want- it will get left behind in the dust arguement wise.

How is a CNN article with actual quotes from members of the 9/11 commission "unsubstantiated"?



Jesus, GePap, you make this too easy. You're taking all the fun out of pwning you...

[chequita guevara]

Ex-presidents don't critize sitting Presidents. Period. I would be shocked if Clinton did anything other than support Bush.

[GePap]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten

Go ahead and post the same unsubstantiated article all you want- it will get left behind in the dust arguement wise.

How is a CNN article with actual quotes from members of the 9/11 commission "unsubstantiated"?

I speak of the WS piece it seems at least one republican commissioner had read as well.

Jesus, GePap, you make this too easy. You're taking all the fun out of pwning you...

You know, the funniest case of pwoning is when you called me a liar for making a mistake about the last recession, then you said something utterly wrong, then I burried you under the obvious evidence of you being wrong and you ran from the thread like a little girl...now that was funny

[Drake Tungsten]

I speak of the WS piece it seems at least one republican commissioner had read as well.

Why bring up an article that hasn't been mentioned in this thread and one that I haven't linked to since the first and only time I did so? Is that your pathetic attempt to portray me as a person "stuck with repetative posts"?



BTW, what evidence do you have that the 9/11 commissioner was using the WS article as his source of information?

edit: Especially when the commissioner says that the intelligence comes from "captured documents." You think he means a copy of the Weekly Standard found in Saddam's bathroom?