Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Clinton Back's Bush's War in Iraq

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Clinton Back's Bush's War in Iraq

    (CNN) -- Former President Clinton has revealed that he continues to support President Bush's decision to go to war in Iraq but chastised the administration over the abuses at Abu Ghraib prison.

    "I have repeatedly defended President Bush against the left on Iraq, even though I think he should have waited until the U.N. inspections were over," Clinton said in a Time magazine interview that will hit newsstands Monday, a day before the publication of his book "My Life."

    Clinton, who was interviewed Thursday, said he did not believe that Bush went to war in Iraq over oil or for imperialist reasons but out of a genuine belief that large quantities of weapons of mass destruction remained unaccounted for.

    Noting that Bush had to be "reeling" in the wake of the attacks of September 11, 2001, Clinton said Bush's first priority was to keep al Qaeda and other terrorist networks from obtaining "chemical and biological weapons or small amounts of fissile material."

    "That's why I supported the Iraq thing. There was a lot of stuff unaccounted for," Clinton said in reference to Iraq and the fact that U.N. weapons inspectors left the country in 1998.

    "So I thought the president had an absolute responsibility to go to the U.N. and say, 'Look, guys, after 9/11, you have got to demand that Saddam Hussein lets us finish the inspection process.' You couldn't responsibly ignore [the possibility that] a tyrant had these stocks," Clinton said.

    Pressed on whether the Iraq war was worth the cost to the United States, Clinton said he would not have undertaken the war until after U.N. chief weapons inspector Hans Blix "finished his job."

    Weapons inspectors led by Blix scoured Iraq for three and a half months before the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003 but left after President Bush issued an ultimatum to Iraqi President Saddam Hussein to leave the country.

    "I want it to have been worth it, even though I didn't agree with the timing of the attack," Clinton said.

    Clinton blamed the Abu Ghraib prison abuses on poorly trained National Guard personnel and higher-ups in the Bush administration.

    The former president said he was not surprised by the abuses committed by U.S. forces at Abu Ghraib but that he was surprised by their extent.

    "There is no excuse for that," Clinton said.

    Clinton blamed the abuses on the higher echelons of the Bush administration.

    "The more we learn about it, the more it seems that some people fairly high up, at least, thought that this was the way it ought to be done," he said.

    Implying that the United States should lead by example, Clinton said of the abuses, "No. 1, we can't pull stunts like that, and No. 2, when we do, whoever is responsible has to pay."
    I can't believe this hasn't been posted yet (unless I missed it).

    While I loved Clinton as a leader (a better uniter than either Bushes), his moderate tendancies have shown that, while a decent enough Democratic leader, his ideals should not be those of the Democratic party. The simple fact that he says that he defended Bush "against the left" makes me again wonder about my faith in the American political system (which is good when compared to, like, Zimbabwe.)

    Michael Moore was right...perhaps Clinton was the best Republican president of the 20th century.

    Perhaps it is due to Clinton that the Democrats don't have a definite leader.
    "I predict your ignore will rival Ben's" - Ecofarm
    ^ The Poly equivalent of:
    "I hope you can see this 'cause I'm [flipping you off] as hard as I can" - Ignignokt the Mooninite

  • #2
    I only just saw this. Weird, but not wholly unthinkable. *shrugs shoulders*
    The cake is NOT a lie. It's so delicious and moist.

    The Weighted Companion Cube is cheating on you, that slut.

    Comment


    • #3
      No, they haven't had a definite leader since Lyndon Johnson and even then the left hated him.

      I don't find it odd that Clinton is backing Bush. He was the president after all. He knows the kind of crap that the POTUS has to worry about.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by DRoseDARs
        I only just saw this. Weird, but not wholly unthinkable. *shrugs shoulders*
        shouldn't be. Clinton has supported this from the beginning. Of course he supported finishing the inspections and waiting for the U.N. as well. So there's a slight difference.

        Really this is old news. Haven't you guys been paying attention to what Clinton was saying at the beginning of 2003?

        Comment


        • #5
          No.
          The cake is NOT a lie. It's so delicious and moist.

          The Weighted Companion Cube is cheating on you, that slut.

          Comment


          • #6
            This was pretty much the position of most Democratic politicians, including Kerry.
            "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
            -Bokonon

            Comment


            • #7
              And now an example of how the media distorts the facts:



              Clinton: Timing of Iraq Attack Was Wrong

              1 hour, 18 minutes ago Add U.S. National - AP to My Yahoo!

              NEW YORK - The Bush administration made a mistake by invading Iraq (news - web sites) before United Nations (news - web sites) weapons inspectors finished their work, former President Bill Clinton (news - web sites) said in advance of Tuesday's release of his memoir, "My Life."

              In an interview to be published in Time magazine, he said that even though he didn't agree with the timing of the attack, he wants the Iraq invasion "to have been worth it."

              "I think if you have a pluralistic, secure, stable Iraq, the people of Iraq will be better off, and it might help the process of internal reform in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere," Clinton said.

              Terrorism festering in Iraq could make the lives of Iraqis worse than they had been under Hussein, Clinton said in a "60 Minutes" interview to be broadcast Sunday.

              U.N. inspectors were pulled from Iraq just before the war began in March 2003, as senior U.S. officials offered assurances Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) was hiding weapons of mass destruction. Months later, retired chief U.S. weapons inspector David Kay concluded Saddam did not have stockpiles of forbidden weapons, although he was conducting programs related to producing such weapons.

              Asked whether he agrees with Bush that removing Saddam from power has made the world safer from terrorism, Clinton said, "I think the Iraqis are better off with Saddam gone, if they can have a stable government.

              "There have been more terrorists move into Iraq in the aftermath of the conflict. I still believe, as I always have, that the biggest terrorist threat by far is al-Qaida and the al-Qaida network," Clinton said in the CBS interview.

              Infinity Broadcasting aired excerpts of the book Saturday in which the former president described his reaction to hearing Martin Luther King's stirring call for unity in his "I Have a Dream" speech in 1963, when the future president was 17.

              "I started crying during the speech and wept for a good while after Dr. King finished," Clinton said. "More than anything I ever experienced, except perhaps the power of my grandfather's example, that speech steeled my determination to do whatever I could for the rest of my life, to make Martin Luther King's dream come true."

              Now this is a different story, using a small part of Clinton's actual stance. Only this time, the story, which is on the Front Page of Yahoo!, focuses on the negative and glosses over his support for the action.

              Selective reporting anyone?

              Comment


              • #8
                And you expected anything else... spin is what it's all about
                Keep on Civin'
                RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

                Comment


                • #9
                  This is even more condemnation against the war.
                  Rethink Refuse Reduce Reuse

                  Do It Ourselves

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by General Ludd
                    This is even more condemnation against the war.
                    No, it's tunnel vision.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Harry Tuttle
                      Selective reporting anyone?
                      How do you know witch one's distorting the facts, the article woun't be out until tomorrow.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Harry Tuttle


                        No, it's tunnel vision.
                        I hope you realise that I was refering to Clinton's support (even if it is half-heated) as being another strike against the war.
                        Rethink Refuse Reduce Reuse

                        Do It Ourselves

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          And now an example of how the media distorts the facts:


                          They've been doing that a lot lately, haven't they? The coverage of the 9/11 commision's report is particularly disgusting...
                          KH FOR OWNER!
                          ASHER FOR CEO!!
                          GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
                            And now an example of how the media distorts the facts:


                            They've been doing that a lot lately, haven't they? The coverage of the 9/11 commision's report is particularly disgusting...
                            how so?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              The fact that they tried to portray the 9/11 commision's report as a refutation of the adminstration's claims that there were ties between Iraq and Al Qaeda, even after the members of the administration and members of the 9/11 commision itself said that the report did no such thing and questioned how the media could come to such a conclusion.

                              What's the point of having a media if they lie just as much as the politicians do?
                              KH FOR OWNER!
                              ASHER FOR CEO!!
                              GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X