Originally posted by GePap
[
The German Nation was the primary aim of the nazi's Yes, other Europeans were aryans, but the Nazi had no loyaty to them. Certainly they viewed certain peoples as superior to others in their ability to create culture, but still, loyalty in Germany was to the German State and the Nazi party, not to the "aryan race"
LOTM - the natural impact of ruling a state. Like the policy of the CPSU, which put the Soviet state above international working class interests whenever the came into conflict. I have no doubt that if AQ came into firm control of a state (more so than their precarious position in backward afghanistan)they would put that states interests first. Of course i mean to the states interest as support for their own position, not "real national interest" Nazi foreign policy was clearly not in the real national interest of Germany. (see Hildebrand)
You can't get away from the fact that fascism was a highly screwed up ideology that was not at all fully set up. From what you have described from berman, I think he is euating the two for the rationale of creating a call to arms of the left - and perhaps not solely for the validity of the comparison.
[
The German Nation was the primary aim of the nazi's Yes, other Europeans were aryans, but the Nazi had no loyaty to them. Certainly they viewed certain peoples as superior to others in their ability to create culture, but still, loyalty in Germany was to the German State and the Nazi party, not to the "aryan race"
LOTM - the natural impact of ruling a state. Like the policy of the CPSU, which put the Soviet state above international working class interests whenever the came into conflict. I have no doubt that if AQ came into firm control of a state (more so than their precarious position in backward afghanistan)they would put that states interests first. Of course i mean to the states interest as support for their own position, not "real national interest" Nazi foreign policy was clearly not in the real national interest of Germany. (see Hildebrand)
BTW, both with respect to Italian fascist modernism, and German racialism, we are tripping up on the many internal contradictions of fascism. Lets admit it - european fascism, unlike Marxism, was a profoundly anti-intellectual movement, and thus it is very difficult to get a consistent ideogical position out of its writings. We are left, i think, with the kind of historical tracings of influence that Berman does.
You can't get away from the fact that fascism was a highly screwed up ideology that was not at all fully set up. From what you have described from berman, I think he is euating the two for the rationale of creating a call to arms of the left - and perhaps not solely for the validity of the comparison.
I fear i dont do him justice. I really suggest reading him yourself, as this topic seems to interest you.
Comment