Al Qaeda threatens chemical attack on Tel Aviv

[Edan]

Al Qaeda threatens chemical attack on Tel Aviv

A high ranking al Qaeda official says on video: "We'll hurt Eilat when we can". Takes credit for attempted attack on Jordon.
Maariv News Service


Advertisement
"Alla knows, if we could get chemical weapons, we would use them against Israeli cities like Eilat and Tel Aviv", said a high ranking al Qaeda member in a video cassette broadcast on an Arab television station and uploaded on Moslem websites on the Internet.

He made these statements in response to reports that Jordanian security forces had averted a chemical attack that al Qaeda planned to carry out in that country. He admitted that the organization planned to carry out an attack, but that it was not chemical.

"Yes, we planned to destroy the building which houses Jordanian intelligence", he said. "But the statement that the attack was meant to be chemical is a pure lie… a creation of the evil Jordanian establishment".

Al Qaeda took responsibility for a number of other major attacks on Iraq

link

[Dis]

aren't they also threatening a chemical attack on mainland U.S.?

they need to make up their mind

[Panag]

hi ,

wmd's used against Israel will lead to nukes dropping out of the sky , .....

al fukaida better rethinks before they act , .... the whole arab world might be nuked to hell , .....

have a nice day


panag checks his masks , opens the bunker and will post from there from now on

[Robert]

nukes on what ???

[Agathon]

It's all talk, but I won't care if they manage to pull it off.

[Dis]

yeah, it's only Israelis

[Vince278]

Empty threats are just f*rts in the wind. I'm getting tired of the media for letting these scumbag's rants see the light of day.

[Agathon]

While they're at it they can revive their project to bomb Old Trafford too.

[Sikander]

Originally posted by Agathon
It's all talk, but I won't care if they manage to pull it off.

Yea, I hope they do nuke the Arabs off of the map.

[DRoseDARs]

[troll]Bear in mind: If we "nuke the Arabs off of the map" we won't be able to access our ...erm... their oil as their land will be irradiated for centuries. Better to invade, occupy, and brutally supress them while cynically claiming moral superiority and bringing the gift of Democracy, American Puppet Government style. [/troll]

[Zevico]

Well, this changes everything!
And here I was thinking that Al Qaida wouldn't dare stoop so low...

[Frankychan]

Innocent Arabs? Some are obvious arseholes; those that are carrying out attacks against innocent Israeli's/Jordanians/[insert country of origin here], but we forget that there are a lot of Arabs in the Mid-East that are just living their lives.

"Nuking them off the face of the Earth" would be just as bad. Tac-nukes, hitting concentrated areas of them and/or bases would be a drastic improvement.

Innocent life lost on either side is an atrocity.

[Sandman]

I'd rather be on the receiving end of a chemical attack than a conventional attack.

We're very lucky that the terrorists are wasting so much energy trying to acquire such an impotent weapons system. Gas isn't banned because it's super-effective, it banned because it's ungentlemanly.

Also, the idea that nukes are an appropriate response to chemical weapons is completely and utterly insane.

[Last Conformist]

@panag: What makes you believe that AQ would object to nukes dropping over the Arab world?

[Kuciwalker]

Originally posted by Sandman
I'd rather be on the receiving end of a chemical attack than a conventional attack.

We're very lucky that the terrorists are wasting so much energy trying to acquire such an impotent weapons system. Gas isn't banned because it's super-effective, it banned because it's ungentlemanly.

Also, the idea that nukes are an appropriate response to chemical weapons is completely and utterly insane.

Not really. All are WMD. In general, every country's policy is that an attack with WMD will be met with WMD. Since Israel only has nukes...