Holy ****, did anyone see the latest Something Awful weekend web?

[Az]

http://www.somethingawful.com/articles.php?a=2140

I am referring to the Boy Bliss crap.

HOLY ****!

How are these things allowed to stay online? ! Isn't there some sort of law against this? this is disgusting.

[Dr Strangelove]

I know that there are police agencies that stage stings for guys like these. The site sounds like a wonderful place for them to troll.

[Stefu]

Yeah, that Boy Bliss thing was... like, damn...

One of the better Weekend Webs lately, mainly because the BB forums offered a good glimpse to the murkier side of humanity. However, it was definitely better when they only mocked one forum at one installment (PEOPLE WITH SA ACCOUNTS, I EXCEPT YOU TO FORWARD MY WHINE TO LOWTAX NOW!11!11) If they had devoted an entire installment to the molesters, it would have been pure situation-horror gold, surpassing even macro-vore fetishist otherkin furries or what have you.

Especially creepy were the overtones that some of the boymolesters had relationships with boys, and the parents of those boys approved. WHY?

[General Ludd]

Originally posted by Stefu

Especially creepy were the overtones that some of the boymolesters had relationships with boys, and the parents of those boys approved. WHY?

Wasn't there a story posted a while ago about a mother who met up with a guy online and agred to meet with him and let him rape her 7 year old or something?


Or was that another forum?

[Az]

One of the better Weekend Webs lately, mainly because the BB forums offered a good glimpse to the murkier side of humanity. However, it was definitely better when they only mocked one forum at one installment (PEOPLE WITH SA ACCOUNTS, I EXCEPT YOU TO FORWARD MY WHINE TO LOWTAX NOW!11!11) If they had devoted an entire installment to the molesters, it would have been pure situation-horror gold, surpassing even macro-vore fetishist otherkin furries or what have you.

Yes. Well, I am not sure I'd really like that. I mean, those gagging teens in the Olson twins forums were pure relief! Well, you could always surf to that forum, to pick up those gems. (not).

Actually, we haven't had an invasion or even a mini-invasion for a very long time. This kind of scum is a prime candidate of a forum.

[Pekka]

What a sick forum. Supercitizen protecting the little ones too is itching for some trigger time. They already have justified their acts to themselves and other ones like that with little acronyms and definitions... what a sick bunch of dirty mother****ers.

[Seeker]

umm I thought the point of SA was.....well....whatever it was I thought it was something besides illegal porn.

[JohnT]

Last thing I would do is register at some perv forum like that, even if it was to defend the honor of All That is Good and Decent. Who knows what sort of blanket sting operation one would get caught up in?

[Spiffor]

What amazes me the most is that behind the whole "I love them, I care for them" rhetoric, these people shamelessly show they care only of themselves, of their own satisfaction. Well, I guess SA chose only the most damning posts, but I don't expect these people to post something about how the child feels or develop: what is important for these pedophiles is how they feel

[Az]

They field that they're molding the children in their own image. Many of them expressed that they had similar experiences as children. It's like a circle of perversion.

[Pekka]

Spiffor, yeah.. it's like saying 'Well I do kiss them good night after a good .....' yeah right.

JohnT, You'd be on COPS and they'd arrest you and all your relatives would be watching it, you screaming and kicking for a mistake with the topic on the screen 'pedophile ring bust'.. There's something about Mary-style.

[Fake Boris]

Originally posted by Spiffor
What amazes me the most is that behind the whole "I love them, I care for them" rhetoric, these people shamelessly show they care only of themselves, of their own satisfaction.

That's the point of love Spiffor. It's easy to say that when the kind of person you like is sexually aware and willing. I think we should 'sympathize' with paedophiles in the sense that it's probably the worst affliction one can be born with.

[Space05us]

That is disgusting.

[mrmitchell]

:vomit:

EDIT: I wonder, though, now that they're exposed to thousands (more than thousands) of people by way of SA, are the folks at BoyBliss going to realize they don't have their internet anonymity any more, and shut up and move somewhere else? Could be a bummer for any kind of police sting now or in the future.

[Spiffor]

Originally posted by Oncle Boris
That's the point of love Spiffor. It's easy to say that when the kind of person you like is sexually aware and willing. I think we should 'sympathize' with paedophiles in the sense that it's probably the worst affliction one can be born with.

I agree that it is an affliction. But I disagree with the very existence of these forums, whose aim is only to bring feelgood to pedophiles, which will probably result in more acts of pedophilia. More certainly than kiddie porn, since kiddie porn could at least be a catharsis to some of its viewers.

Don't get me wrong, I am generally in favor of sympathizing with the afflicted, and I am generally in support of this kind of discussion to lose guilt about it. "Anonymous alcoholics" or "Fatties without complex" discussions get my whole support, because the desinhibition doesn't fricking hurt other people. Pedophilic attraction is something we should be sympathetic about - bedophilic behaviour, and feelgood attempts at it, is something we should definitely condemn