Is making gay marriage illegal censoring relationships?

[Ming]

Kontiki... so true.

That check list is not going in BK's favor.

I again ask him for logical reasons beyond religious beliefs.
Every one he has brought up to date has indeed been shot down, or he has shot himself in the foot trying to respond.

It comes down to equal rights for all... it's that simple.
Gays need the legal protections offered by marriage just like heterosexual couples. If a religion doesn't want to recognize such relationships... fine... that doesn't effect the legal standing in the eyes of the Government.

[Flubber]

Originally posted by Ming
Kontiki... so true.


It comes down to equal rights for all... it's that simple.
Gays need the legal protections offered by marriage just like heterosexual couples. If a religion doesn't want to recognize such relationships... fine... that doesn't effect the legal standing in the eyes of the Government.

[Ming]

I await BK's next reason why gay marriages are bad

[chequita guevara]

Marriage is for fags!












Marriage is also for breeders!

[Kontiki]

I'm waiting for his full-blown "allowing gay marriages is such an affront to straight people that they will stop getting married and having children, eventually leading to the complete collapse of society" arguement. That's basically what he's been hinting at in this thread, but I want to see him take it to the next level.

[Agathon]

Isn't the answer that God made ****s to go up ****s?

Damn, even the autocensor forces sexual ambiguity upon us! I can't even express God's word without it making my post ambiguous between Godly love and the evil Satanic sort that homosexuals practice.

Apolyton is promoting the homosexual agenda!!!! Nofaaiiiirrrrr!!

[Ming]

If any straight people stop getting married and having children because gay people are allowed to get married in the eyes of the government, then one must truely question whether they really love each other and should be getting married in the first place. Marriage is commitment between two people who love each other... what other people do should have no impact on that.

[Whaleboy]

Ming:

The main problem I have with BK is that he talks about "morality" but offers no clear definition of that, nor any particular reason why his is better than mine, the latter allowing gay marriage. I ask for clarification and enlightenment *drags on spliff*.

[MrFun]

Originally posted by Ming
I await BK's next reason why gay marriages are bad

No -- don't encourage him!

[GePap]

Damn, Ben can make any thread about abortion or gays 150 post long!

it's a gift really.

[MrFun]

You call this a *****ing gift??

I call it punishment.

[gunkulator]

Originally posted by Ming
Marriage is commitment between two people who love each other... what other people do should have no impact on that.

Just to play Devil's Advocate: Why limit marriage to only two people? Is there a reason I can't marry, say, all my roomates or the entire floor of my apartment? Would it be fair to sue my employer if they objected to providing insurance for all these people?

[yavoon]

Originally posted by gunkulator

Just to play Devil's Advocate: Why limit marriage to only two people? Is there a reason I can't marry, say, all my roomates or the entire floor of my apartment? Would it be fair to sue my employer if they objected to providing insurance for all these people?

I do agree that the 2 ppl limit is about as arbitrary as the man/women limit.

[Ming]

Hmmm... I noticed BK was posting, so I figured I would bump this

But... he will probably stay away and just start his arguments all over again in the next thread on this subject... figuring how hammered he got in this thread

[Flip McWho]

Het gets hammered in every thread and then some when its raised briefly. He's the single most pig headed person I've seen.

Ming your a devious bastard bumping this thread just for that reason.