Tweet
Everyone:
I ran across this article while perusing the wires and figured some folks at 'Poly might be interested in debating the possible ramifications of this report, should it turn out to be true. The article is posted below; contribute to this thread as you see fit after reading it.
***
***
I don't even want to think about the possibilities of tactical nukes going off within the United States, for I fear it would result in a horror that would extend far beyond our borders, if you get my drift.
But that said, why does the Russian government deny the existence of suitcase nukes? I thought it was common knowledge that such devices do exist?
On a final note, I'm beginning to think the nuclear genie can no longer be contained to the "big" powers. A lot of of nations and terror groups are going to end up with them, or similar WMDs, and the rest of the world is simply going to have to learn to live with it. No, I don't like the idea myself, but what can be done about it? Nothing other than improving one's own security, that's about it.
Gatekeeper
I ran across this article while perusing the wires and figured some folks at 'Poly might be interested in debating the possible ramifications of this report, should it turn out to be true. The article is posted below; contribute to this thread as you see fit after reading it.
***
CAIRO (Reuters) — A pan-Arab newspaper said Sunday that the al Qaeda organization led by Osama bin Laden bought tactical nuclear weapons from Ukraine in 1998 and is storing them in safe places for possible use.
There was no independent corroboration of the report, which appeared in the newspaper al-Hayat under an Islamabad dateline and cited sources close to al Qaeda, which the United States blames for the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
The newspaper said al Qaeda bought the weapons in suitcases in a deal arranged when Ukrainian scientists visited the Afghan city of Kandahar in 1998. The city was then a stronghold of the Taliban movement, which was allied with al Qaeda.
Al Qaeda would use the weapons only inside the United States or if the group faced a "crushing blow" which threatened its existence, such as the use of nuclear or chemical weapons against its fighters, the paper quoted its sources as saying.
Ukraine inherited nuclear weapons from the Soviet Union but in 1994 it agreed to send 1,900 nuclear warheads to Russia and sign up to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
After the Soviet Union broke up in 1991, a former Russian National Security Adviser, Alexander Lebed, said that up to 100 portable suitcase-sized bombs were unaccounted for. Moscow has denied such weapons existed.
Lebed said each one was equivalent to 1,000 tons of TNT and could kill as many as 100,000 people.
Al-Hayat did not say how many weapons al Qaeda bought or say who exactly had provided them.
A Pakistani government official said Secretary of State Colin Powell was expected to visit Islamabad soon to discuss nuclear proliferation, after a top scientist there admitted passing atomic program secrets to third parties.
The United States has repeatedly said its worst fear is that a group like al Qaeda might obtain access to weapons of mass destruction and use them against the American people.
There was no independent corroboration of the report, which appeared in the newspaper al-Hayat under an Islamabad dateline and cited sources close to al Qaeda, which the United States blames for the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
The newspaper said al Qaeda bought the weapons in suitcases in a deal arranged when Ukrainian scientists visited the Afghan city of Kandahar in 1998. The city was then a stronghold of the Taliban movement, which was allied with al Qaeda.
Al Qaeda would use the weapons only inside the United States or if the group faced a "crushing blow" which threatened its existence, such as the use of nuclear or chemical weapons against its fighters, the paper quoted its sources as saying.
Ukraine inherited nuclear weapons from the Soviet Union but in 1994 it agreed to send 1,900 nuclear warheads to Russia and sign up to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
After the Soviet Union broke up in 1991, a former Russian National Security Adviser, Alexander Lebed, said that up to 100 portable suitcase-sized bombs were unaccounted for. Moscow has denied such weapons existed.
Lebed said each one was equivalent to 1,000 tons of TNT and could kill as many as 100,000 people.
Al-Hayat did not say how many weapons al Qaeda bought or say who exactly had provided them.
A Pakistani government official said Secretary of State Colin Powell was expected to visit Islamabad soon to discuss nuclear proliferation, after a top scientist there admitted passing atomic program secrets to third parties.
The United States has repeatedly said its worst fear is that a group like al Qaeda might obtain access to weapons of mass destruction and use them against the American people.
I don't even want to think about the possibilities of tactical nukes going off within the United States, for I fear it would result in a horror that would extend far beyond our borders, if you get my drift.
But that said, why does the Russian government deny the existence of suitcase nukes? I thought it was common knowledge that such devices do exist?
On a final note, I'm beginning to think the nuclear genie can no longer be contained to the "big" powers. A lot of of nations and terror groups are going to end up with them, or similar WMDs, and the rest of the world is simply going to have to learn to live with it. No, I don't like the idea myself, but what can be done about it? Nothing other than improving one's own security, that's about it.
Gatekeeper
Comment