Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How do they explain western dominance in other world regions?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • if you think that's trashing, then its your right

    i was speaking about not unifyable differences though
    differences - not positions in a value system - a very common disease in someparts of the world

    Comment


    • kidicious, there is no single "western civ" to have its achievements" claimed for it.


      there a very very loose european civ that has huge cutting lines and a great number oflinesbetween itself.

      US is something different compeltly, and europe is not one either.

      and there certaintly is no one "Western civ"

      Comment


      • certaintly not historically but also at present

        Comment


        • You can study the historical events of a certain geographical area but from there on trying to give it a never existed attribute is simply false. Luckily few ever did it and most of them also acknowledge that they had to revert to arbitrary theoritical creations moslty for teaching cohesion pruproses.

          "west" doesnt exist, never had.

          Comment


          • And I thought the political arguments were blatant trolls on the parts of some people. Paitkis:

            Gotta love somebody who denies the evidence of the world around them!

            Comment


            • Gotta love the "culture" of the US (which is not "Western) as JohnT demonsrates it

              Comment


              • Don;t worry JohnT you're still.. something but certaintly not something "western"

                Comment


                • Paiktis22, you have put a very interesting perspective on the whole "western civilization" thing. I have never imagined the term as a product of cold war us-vs-them propaganda

                  Now put the cards on the table. Is the exclusion of Greece from "western civilization" by Huntington what irks you?

                  He he he, live with it!

                  Our western civ is an exclusive club and you get to be in the second league with Russia and her satellites!

                  Comment




                  • Eh, this is growing old fast. Y'all have fun, but be nice - I'm sure Paiktis means well.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by VetLegion
                      Paiktis22, you have put a very interesting perspective on the whole "western civilization" thing. I have never imagined the term as a product of cold war us-vs-them propaganda
                      Thanks

                      Comment


                      • But that's what pumped it, it was a nouvueate of th eearly 19th century. a name given to something that doesnt exist by a bunch of theoriticians then pumped up for other aims.


                        however to claim one such unifying and homogenious thing exists is hilarious.

                        Comment


                        • hungtoington doesnt even enter the equation BTW.
                          he's been shot down so many times it isnt even funny

                          there are others claiming a western civ with much more potent arguments - oh wait coming to think about it, there are none. its all a theoritical come together of facts and the lesson is simply called like that.

                          Comment


                          • to claim as starting point the hellenistic times is even more hilarious. to claim unifying transendence between the diffirent european cultural and structural entitis is hilarious too, to claim an historical continuous depth and progression too, well that's just absurd.

                            Comment


                            • political aims and societal mythomotors do not equal historical accuracy. never did. thats why they're called differently

                              Comment


                              • i'm very interested in hearing the "western" civ of revolutionary french republic with the evolutionary english monarchy and the rootbreaking societal innovation of the russian state.
                                i'm sure it's one great civ and has many differences with ataturk's social revolution, mao's cultural one and india's widespread democratic believes.

                                I'd also like to hear about the great "Western" civ of the panspermia of languages (including non indoeuropean ones) and how they differantiate with hebrew or arabic progressing to social and functional entities the unique mathematician genious of the "west" as it progressed superbly and uninterupted (LOL) from pythagoras to arabia to the franks and the eastern romans or greeks lol...


                                yeah sure one great "western" civ.


                                get over it, the cold war is over and the terrorist one doesnt have the same allies, wether some like it or not.
                                also dont worry you can still be something without being "western" - it does more good than bad (maybe because it exactly is made up)

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X