Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How do they explain western dominance in other world regions?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Alexander's expansion was well after the golden age of Greek civilization.
    Past the peak of Greek culture, (although there was plenty of important scientific and whatnot stuff going on all through the Helenistic period) but hardly past the peak of Greek military power.
    Stop Quoting Ben

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by paiktis22
      And what could be the "defining aspects" of western civilization which even more hilariously it is portraited as having an historical continuity no less.
      The "defining aspects" are those borne of Western Christendom, as opposed to Orthodox Christendom.

      And what about the political "unity" of the Greek city states during the golden age of Hellenic civilization? Oh wait, they were not unified, they were a mass of often-warring city-states...
      Tutto nel mondo è burla

      Comment


      • #48
        But you're not answering my question Boris.
        What are the defining aspects of the so called "western civilization". The ones that tell it apart from others, distinctively.

        And then there's the hilarity of it having an historical continuity as well.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Boshko

          Past the peak of Greek culture, (although there was plenty of important scientific and whatnot stuff going on all through the Helenistic period) but hardly past the peak of Greek military power.
          Militarism is not a sign of civilization. On the contrary, it is a herald of its decline. Has no one read Toynbee?
          Tutto nel mondo è burla

          Comment


          • #50
            Militarism is not a sign of civilization. On the contrary, it is a herald of its decline.
            So? The Hellenistic states were pretty significant entities (until they became pathetic shadows whose armies could be pushed around by a single Roman envoy) that significantly altered the culture of the Middle East so Alexander's Conquest was hardly historically insignificant (my original point).
            Stop Quoting Ben

            Comment


            • #51
              I didn't say they weren't historically significant.
              Tutto nel mondo è burla

              Comment


              • #52
                Untill you answer my question,

                it is interesting to noe that the so called "Western civilization" term was born for the first time after the beggining of the cold war and was a clear try to create false unity amongst entities that were different throughout their historical journey. protestantism and catholisim produce different values. even today's US can't be called "western" but mostly because such a term doesnt historically exist.

                there can a european societal culture but which itself is false and a creation of even more modern political aims. and isnt correct either.

                about the city states, what common aspect existed aside all speaking greek and considering all others as barbarians?
                their political systems and values were hugely different within themselves.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Militarism is not a sign of civilization. On the contrary, it is a herald of its decline

                  I don't think this is correct. Rome, for example.
                  urgh.NSFW

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Azazel
                    Militarism is not a sign of civilization. On the contrary, it is a herald of its decline

                    I don't think this is correct. Rome, for example.
                    That is a prime example of it. Roman civilization's golden age was the Republic. Then came the Time of Troubles, which was the civil wars and rise of the dictators. The unified state of Empire was a reaction to that crisis--the solution was the rise of an extreme Roman militarism and great geographical expansion. But Roman civilization's great achievements were behind it. The Empire was the beginning of the end. There was an Indian Summer under the 5 good emperors, but otherwise it was a cultural decline and fall.
                    Tutto nel mondo è burla

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Sure, Paiktis. Keep saying places like the US, Australia, Canada, and Brazil aren't western.
                      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Rome, for example.


                        Or China.
                        KH FOR OWNER!
                        ASHER FOR CEO!!
                        GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Oerdin
                          Sure, Paiktis. Keep saying places like the US, Australia, Canada, and Brazil aren't western.

                          Any reply?

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Huntington's 8 Characteristics that define Western Civ:

                            Classical legacy
                            Western Christianity
                            European languages
                            separation of spiritual and temporal authority
                            rule of law
                            social pluralism and civil society
                            representative bodies
                            individualism

                            I think these are pretty accurate. No other civilizations prior had possessed all of them, certainly.

                            Your grief over the term "Western Civilization" is incorrect, as it was in common usage before the cold war. Toynbee, among others, was using it in the 1920s and 1930s.
                            Tutto nel mondo è burla

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              I think he forgot rationalism and the scientific method.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Boris: The Republic was EXTREMELY militaristic, certainly much more so than the empire.
                                urgh.NSFW

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X