Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kerry wants to ban NRA tv channel

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Damn, MtG, you took the words right out of my mouth!

    Speaking as a journalist, the *last* thing we need, IMO, is a special interest group passing itself off as a legitimate source of journalism. I worked hard to earn my degree, and I'll be *damned* if a group — be it liberal, conservative or some crazy in-between or even further out on the edge— that has no real interest in providing real news is going to besmirch my profession.

    Let the NRA send its press releases and so on, but, by God, don't ever let them get away with what they're proposing to do.

    Gatekeeper
    "I may not agree with what you have to say, but I'll die defending your right to say it." — Voltaire

    "Wheresoever you go, go with all your heart." — Confucius

    Comment


    • #32
      forgive diplomat


      Why?
      “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
      - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

      Comment


      • #33
        Why can't they run their own network? Why shouldn't they be allowed to deliver the news if people want to hear it from them?
        "I'm moving to the Left" - Lancer

        "I imagine the neighbors on your right are estatic." - Slowwhand

        Comment


        • #34
          Why can't they run their own network? Why shouldn't they be allowed to deliver the news if people want to hear it from them?


          Because there are an interest group. If you allow the NRA to run a propaganda channel (and it will be), you have to allow EVERY interest group to run a channel.
          “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
          - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Gatekeeper
            Damn, MtG, you took the words right out of my mouth!

            Speaking as a journalist, the *last* thing we need, IMO, is a special interest group passing itself off as a legitimate source of journalism. I worked hard to earn my degree, and I'll be *damned* if a group — be it liberal, conservative or some crazy in-between or even further out on the edge— that has no real interest in providing real news is going to besmirch my profession.

            Let the NRA send its press releases and so on, but, by God, don't ever let them get away with what they're proposing to do.

            Gatekeeper
            Damn straight! We should leave the besmirching to the professionals!
            No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
              Why can't they run their own network? Why shouldn't they be allowed to deliver the news if people want to hear it from them?


              Because there are an interest group. If you allow the NRA to run a propaganda channel (and it will be), you have to allow EVERY interest group to run a channel.

              As long as the cable company doesnt force me to pay for the NRA channel or the ACLU channel, i dont care what they do. TV was ruined when the Golf channel came on. And who knows it may be entertaining. Next thing you know you'll be surfing the channels and see the PETA channel.
              Which side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We are evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that. --Saul Tigh

              Comment


              • #37
                As long as the cable company doesnt force me to pay for the NRA channel or the ACLU channel, i dont care what they do.


                Yes, but it wants a media exemption to be able to be called a news station, so it can get around McCain-Feingold.
                “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                Comment


                • #38
                  this guy tells it better than i could ever imagine


                  Since when is...

                  Betty Cuniberti


                  ... a guy?

                  KH FOR OWNER!
                  ASHER FOR CEO!!
                  GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Betty was a guy in 'Kung Pow: Enter the Fist' .
                    “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                    - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
                      Why can't they run their own network? Why shouldn't they be allowed to deliver the news if people want to hear it from them?


                      Because there are an interest group. If you allow the NRA to run a propaganda channel (and it will be), you have to allow EVERY interest group to run a channel.
                      Why not? If there is a market for a Union Channel, an NAACP channel, or an ACLU channel, so be it. I can't see why there would be a problem with people sending out information to people who want to see it.
                      "I'm moving to the Left" - Lancer

                      "I imagine the neighbors on your right are estatic." - Slowwhand

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Why not? If there is a market for a Union Channel, an NAACP channel, or an ACLU channel, so be it. I can't see why there would be a problem with people sending out information to people who want to see it.


                        You let them all have 'news' channels with the campaign finance exception then you've basically gutted McCain-Feingold through a loophole. That's the only reason the NRA wanted to do this in the first place.

                        Kerry is right. Let the NRA play by everyone else's rules and not be able to mention candidates 30 days before the elections and not try to get a loophole by their own channel.
                        “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                        - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Either way this isn't the right way to fix the problem. So long as most people don't give a whatever, elections will be easy to mess around with.

                          Anyway, are political parties not allowed to own TV stations in the U.S.? It's a common practice elsewhere.
                          Visit First Cultural Industries
                          There are reasons why I believe mankind should live in cities and let nature reclaim all the villages with the exception of a few we keep on display as horrific reminders of rural life.-Starchild
                          Meat eating and the dominance and force projected over animals that is acompanies it is a gateway or parallel to other prejudiced beliefs such as classism, misogyny, and even racism. -General Ludd

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            are political parties not allowed to own TV stations in the U.S.?


                            Some would say that the Republicans own Fox , but no, political parties are not allowed to own TV stations. Or at least they aren't indirectly, because they have to give equal time to opponents views .
                            “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                            - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              There appears to be a difference between a cable channel that one must both subsribe to and intentionally watch, and "issue" adds that appear on TV during shows that you want to watch that have nothing to do with politics.

                              After hearing this debate, I side with the NRA, ACLU or UNION channels. The will be essentially the same thing as the Christian TV channels, will they not?
                              http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by The Mad Monk
                                Damn straight! We should leave the besmirching to the professionals!
                                Y'know ... perhaps you're simply too jaded to care about much anymore, or maybe you've been burned once too often, but I do take my profession seriously. It's not just a 9-to-5 job (in my case, a 3-to-midnight job). I don't take the responsibilities I'm given as a member of the fourth estate lightly. Neither do the men and women I work with. The vast majority of us strive to do the right thing, and we've been imprisoned for it, tortured for it, and *killed* because of it. Most of us don't make big bucks, nor do we get the publicity the media "superstars" get.

                                It *enrages* me when public relations flacks and those with agendas masquerade as journalists. It also disheartens me beyond belief when people cannot or will not make the distinction between real, honest to God journalists and the *fakes* when leveling criticism or throwing barbs. But you know what? We persevere, because if we didn't, then *you* would find out what it's really like to live in a society where freedom of information is truly lacking.

                                If what I say makes me look like some naive dumbsh*t in certain matters, then so be it. Life isn't a popularity game.

                                Gatekeeper
                                "I may not agree with what you have to say, but I'll die defending your right to say it." — Voltaire

                                "Wheresoever you go, go with all your heart." — Confucius

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X