Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Payback - French, Germans and Russians barred from Iraq contracts

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    i still don't understand why wolf said it was about security reasons.
    It's pretty simple, really. They went against us on what we stated was a big security issue. It's not in our security interest to encourage that kind of behavior.
    I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

    Comment


    • #77
      That's hardly a discouragement either.

      As I said internal consumption.

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by paiktis22


        2) The reason given is false.
        Remember, M. Wolfowitz does not give reasons false, true, in-between or whatever, he gives bureaucratic reasons, easily acceptable by all parties (no need to be relevant or clearly connected).
        Statistical anomaly.
        The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

        Comment


        • #79
          Wolfowitz is very warhawkish. Hilariously enough he is as much inept in foreign relations. Maybe that's not an accident.

          Comment


          • #80
            It's pretty simple, really. They went against us on what we stated was a big security issue. It's not in our security interest to encourage that kind of behavior.

            whether it was a security issue or not was the crux of the debate, wasn't it?
            B♭3

            Comment


            • #81
              whether it was a security issue or not was the crux of the debate, wasn't it?
              Well, we have consistently stated that Iraq was an important security issue. So it is.
              I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

              Comment


              • #82
                america doesn't exactly have fiat, you know? perhaps it was to us. i'm still not completely convinced of that.

                obviously, europeans saw things a bit differently.
                B♭3

                Comment


                • #83
                  I don't think Europeans can decide whether or not a situation is an important security issue to the US. That's probably best left to the US.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    I don't see why especially if it affects anyone else besides the US.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      the us should decide what's in its own best interest.

                      other countries should decide what's best in theirs.

                      perhaps to them, an attack on iraq was not the wisest nor best cours of action.

                      is that so hard to see?
                      B♭3

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        america doesn't exactly have fiat, you know? perhaps it was to us. i'm still not completely convinced of that.
                        Even if it wasn't, we said it was. So it was.
                        I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          yet another logical breakdown.

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Wolfowitz' remarks on national security obviously refered back to the US' assertion of Iraq as an important security issue, that's why Europe can't really argue in the context of reconstruction deals that it wasn't.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Again it would have been fine if it had stayed at that declaration. From the moment it wasn't, it can.

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                I wonder if the excluded countries can sue under the WTO and/or NAFTA (in the case of Canada)?
                                Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X