Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rommel or Guderian?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    How do you define "better general"? If you mean military theorist or someone in a staff role, by all means Guderian. If you mean someone who commands forces in battle, or who plans and leads campaigns, then I'm not so sure.

    I've always considered von Manstein to be the German's best operational general in WWII.
    Tecumseh's Village, Home of Fine Civilization Scenarios

    www.tecumseh.150m.com

    Comment


    • #32
      On military ground Guderian, no doubt.
      On human ground, that guy was a true arrogant prussian soldier.
      I read his book about his campaigns, he looked at his men as you would look at your car or your horse: spare them, not because they are human beings, but because they will bring you further if you do.
      He knew officers (yes, these are individuals with names) and units (units have names, men composing the units not).
      The books that the world calls immoral are the books that show the world its own shame. Oscar Wilde.

      Comment


      • #33
        the difference between rommel and guderian is that the latter had several entire army corps under his command... rommel didn't ...

        so with the means he had under his command, rommel did the best job ...
        "Ceterum censeo Ben esse expellendum."

        Comment


        • #34
          Daddy Blitzkreig - vote to Guderian
          Haven't been here for ages....

          Comment


          • #35
            As they are both dead, I voted Banana.

            If you had asked "who WAS the better general"...
            Some cry `Allah O Akbar` in the street. And some carry Allah in their heart.
            "The CIA does nothing, says nothing, allows nothing, unless its own interests are served. They are the biggest assembly of liars and theives this country ever put under one roof and they are an abomination" Deputy COS (Intel) US Army 1981-84

            Comment


            • #36
              Well the POLL question said 'Choose which WAS better', so Cruddy you got no excuse .
              “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
              - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: Rommel or Guderian?

                Originally posted by Lancer
                Which is the better general?

                Rommel whipped Patton it the recent poll, now he takes on his fellow countryman, Guderian! WooHoo!
                Lancer's asking 2 different questions here, so if you're really miffed;-

                1) Neither of them are worth spit as a general now, except perhaps to mediumistic ancestor worshipping troops who speak German.

                2) At the time, Guderian was a strategist, (coming up with the ideas) and Rommel was the tactician (delivering the execution of the ideas).
                Some cry `Allah O Akbar` in the street. And some carry Allah in their heart.
                "The CIA does nothing, says nothing, allows nothing, unless its own interests are served. They are the biggest assembly of liars and theives this country ever put under one roof and they are an abomination" Deputy COS (Intel) US Army 1981-84

                Comment


                • #38
                  Guderian. Gotta be, the man wrote the book on modern mechanised warfare.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    I'm another vote for Guderian all the way.
                    Good = Love, Love = Good
                    Evil = Hate, Hate = Evil

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by TheStinger
                      Was Manstein as good as Guderian, I assume people agrre he was better than Rommel
                      Von Manstein and Guderian can't be compared, because their spheres of expertise were so different. Guderian was a theoretician and doctrinal developer first and foremost, and his time (and level) of field command was cut drastically by his disagreements with Hitler. Von Manstein had a huge operations area, had to coordinate some real half-assed underequipped allied troops (Italians and Rumanians especially) and deal with both numerical and materiel disadvantages on a defensive front. At the Army Group / grand operational level, von Manstein was the best there was on any side.
                      When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Dry
                        On military ground Guderian, no doubt.
                        On human ground, that guy was a true arrogant prussian soldier.
                        I read his book about his campaigns, he looked at his men as you would look at your car or your horse: spare them, not because they are human beings, but because they will bring you further if you do.
                        He knew officers (yes, these are individuals with names) and units (units have names, men composing the units not).
                        And that's the way a commander has to be, in order to be successful. Caring too much for your troops will lead to you writing a lot more letters home to wives or parents, because you get paralyzed at making the necessary ugly decisions that are part of warfare.
                        When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by dannubis
                          the difference between rommel and guderian is that the latter had several entire army corps under his command... rommel didn't ...

                          so with the means he had under his command, rommel did the best job ...
                          Rommel had Panzerarmee Afrika, and the Germans and Italians lost a couple of hundred thousand prisoners in May of '43 when it surrendered, and on the western front, Rommel was a Heeresgruppe commander.
                          When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            This would be more fun if it were for the WORST US general of WWII
                            "An Outside Context Problem was the sort of thing most civilisations encountered just once, and which they tended to encounter rather in the same way a sentence encountered a full stop" - Excession

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Hitler. Okay, not a general.

                              Chiang Kai-shek?

                              Who was the Italian they called "Electric Whiskers"? He's a candidate.

                              Some of Stalin's drinking buddies would belong there too, untill Zhukov got them weeded out.
                              "When all else fails, a pigheaded refusal to look facts in the face will see us through." -- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay Melchett

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Didn't Myrddin say US General, uh Clem?
                                “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                                - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X