Prince Charles allegation anyone know what it is?

[Drake Tungsten]

You are correct, sir.

http://www.britannia.com/bios/ebk/maelgggd.html

I do remember there being a great number of Maelgwyns in Welsh history, but it seems like this is the one you were talking about, who was indeed king of Gwynnedd.

[Provost Harrison]

Originally posted by MikeH
The thing he refers to at the beggining is that the 'boss' used to get a special relaxation technique from his masseur at the end of a massage (think League of Gentleman series three Massage Parlour episode).

I remember that one

[Buck Birdseed]

Man, that episode sucked.

[Provost Harrison]

Handjobs, not sucking

[MikeH]

Originally posted by Feephi


Do you think he would actually go to this length just to conceal a story?

No, it's a completely untrue story. Didn't you read what I posted?

[techumseh]

Originally posted by Feephi


Do you think he would actually go to this length just to conceal a story?

Just to conceal a story? It's the Crown of England we're talking about here!

Not that I'm convinced, but really, the stakes ARE pretty big.

[JohnT]

Can the Church of England have an openly admitted bi/homosexual as its head?

[Alexander's Horse]

when haven't they?

[Uncle Sparky]

Originally posted by JohnT
Can the Church of England have an openly admitted bi/homosexual as its head?

Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
when haven't they?

... and I do remember reading about the alleged homosexual rape amongst the serving staff & subsequent cover up a few years ago (from legit source).

[JohnT]

Well, I'm being a bit serious here. Iirc*, the Anglican church is adamantly anti-homosexual and a openly gay head could cause a crisis likely not seen since the Reformation.

*According to my wife. If she's wrong, yell at her.

[Uncle Sparky]

imho - everything that can be done is being done to assure the C of E doen't have an openly gay/bi head.

... gee, maybe Prince William and Prince Michael Jackson have more in common than a silly surname/title...

[techumseh]

Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
when haven't they?

When they've had Queens?

[techumseh]

Originally posted by JohnT
Well, I'm being a bit serious here. Iirc*, the Anglican church is adamantly anti-homosexual and a openly gay head could cause a crisis likely not seen since the Reformation.

*According to my wife. If she's wrong, yell at her.

The Anglican church is currently facing a split over ordination of gay bishops and gay marriage. The Canadian and American church's liberal policies are facing intense opposition from church leaders from developing countries, financed by rich evangelicals from the US.

I'm not sure how the English church stands in all of this, but in a country in which it is illegal for the monarch to be a Roman Catholic, a bisexual King is probably frowned upon. Still, this will probably complicate the gay ordination debate.