I was pretty motivated in college and did very well. I also had a fairly broad background, with a double major in Economics (social sciences) and Applied Mathematics (physical sciences), and an honors thesis in Roman History (humanities). But 25 years after graduating, I can see some glaring gaps in my education. I could have used a course in People Skills 101. A basic course in Ethics would have made it easier to cope with a lot of current issues.
Sure you can pick up some of this stuff on your own. I learned more economics and a lot more about writing after getting a Ph. D. than before. But for the amount of money you are paying for college, why not have the benefit of this learning from go?
I am not sure your average 18 year old freshman (or even an above average one) is capable of identifying courses which will benefit him or her 20+ years in the future. And then there is the question of whether said student is motivated enough to take such courses if they are available. Not to mention the question of whether we (not just the US, but most industrialized countries) are turning out increasingly specialized students who do not have enough generalized knowledge to make informed decisions in a democratic form of government.
So should universities have required courses for all students? If so, which courses should be required? I am not talking about "pick one from Column A and two from Column B" to make sure your education has some breadth. I mean specific courses which every student from performing art to engineering majors has to take.
(U Chicago students and alums feel free to praise or damn The Core at great length.
)
Sure you can pick up some of this stuff on your own. I learned more economics and a lot more about writing after getting a Ph. D. than before. But for the amount of money you are paying for college, why not have the benefit of this learning from go?
I am not sure your average 18 year old freshman (or even an above average one) is capable of identifying courses which will benefit him or her 20+ years in the future. And then there is the question of whether said student is motivated enough to take such courses if they are available. Not to mention the question of whether we (not just the US, but most industrialized countries) are turning out increasingly specialized students who do not have enough generalized knowledge to make informed decisions in a democratic form of government.
So should universities have required courses for all students? If so, which courses should be required? I am not talking about "pick one from Column A and two from Column B" to make sure your education has some breadth. I mean specific courses which every student from performing art to engineering majors has to take.
(U Chicago students and alums feel free to praise or damn The Core at great length.

Comment