Iraq Owes Billions To The United States

[Ramo]

I know what Ollie meant. But the point generalizes. No need to get defensive, I'm just clarifying.

[Bosh]

Originally posted by Ramo
I can't believe I'm actually agreeing with Shrub over the dems on (part of) this issue.

Yeah I know, it causes my black anarchist heart so much pain but Bush is in the right here. I guess I can make myself feel better by being absolutely furious at Bush for not realizing this would happen and for the criminally low amounts of aid that he has given (and asked to be given) to Afghanistan for the last couple years after giving the Afghans extravagant promises while the war was still on.

[Ramo]

Yeah, but right when I was getting excited about the dems starting to act marginally more responsible, they have to pull something evil like this.

[Jon Miller]

the reconstruction is the most important part of this whole deawlly

Jon Miller

[Jac de Molay]

Originally posted by SnowFire
I can't believe it. All the talk about Bush being the one to go to war for oil, and it's the Democrats that actually do it.

If I remember correctly, it was the Administration that, before the war, sold the notion of a reconstruction that was to be partially financed through oil revenues.

I don't see how they couldn't expect this to happen. Costs and financing of the reconstruction were grossly "misunderestimated", and it's coming back to bite 'em in the ass. Just desserts, I say.

[DanS]

Just to make clear, this provision will be removed in conference. This was the dem's opportunity to register their displeasure at Bush, which they have done. But in actual fact, in the final law, this action doesn't mean anything.

[chequita guevara]

What they could have done, instead, to stick it to the President and save us some money would be to cancel all the no bid contracts, and let the Irqais decide what needs to be taken care of, instead of the lobbyists.

[MichaeltheGreat]

Congress has no authority to cancel contracts. Not that the contractors would mind, they'd be owed liquidated damages and lost profits and not have to do a thing.

[SnowFire]

DanS: Could you elaborate? I thought that maybe the thing might just get vetoed, but then there's the question if there'll be ANY money for Iraq.

And I agree that I'm shocked that Bush was actually right in this case. Sure, his fault we had to make the decision, but at least he seems half-committed to doing the Reconstruction right.

I will be most curious to see what the Dem's presidential nominee has to say on this issue. I voted for Gore in 2000, but if they give us a short-sighted type who would ignore the rest of the world until the USA is a utopia, I may be voting Independent.

[DanS]

Well, the House passed a measure that was $2 billion less than what Bush requested, but didn't include the loan provision. The Senate passed a measure that included Bush's full request (I think), but included the loan provision. The two versions will be be reconciled in the conference committee, which the Speaker of the House and the Senate Majority Leader will pack with people who want to give Bush what he wants.

The conference committee will reconcile the two bills so that Bush gets his full request without the loan provision. Then the House and Senate will have an up or down vote on the bill.

[Dinner]

Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
One could always argue that a more realistic assessment of the costs beforehand wouldn't lead to this sort of little problem.

Do you remember when **** Chaney was claiming the war plus recontruction could all be done for $50billion? Three times that has been reached and there is still no end in sight.

On the upside the Japanese have been very generous and have donated $1.5 billion towards the reconstruction of Iraq. Britain is only spending $300 million and the entire EU is only coughing up $200 million.

[MichaeltheGreat]

The Japanese are easily motivated in this case, due to their huge dependency on gulf oil. They will be very nice to whoever has it.

And Cheney was so blatantly full of ****, just on the warfighiting costs alone, that it's amazing to me he was never called on it. A full mechanized division in the field burns up an amazing amount of money on a monthly basis, then you multiply that out times all the other units, the USN and USAF assets, Marines, reserve callups, etc.

This latest bit in the triangle is an interesting development as well - the Iraqis actually showing themselves in platoon strength and going after small US units.

[Drake Tungsten]

The Japanese are easily motivated in this case, due to their huge dependency on gulf oil. They will be very nice to whoever has it.

Damn straight, and if the Chinese keep modernizing we're going to have them by the balls in a few years as well.

[GePap]

As much as i hate this admin for lying through it'd teeth to sell this war, I agree that the Senate was wrong to make any of this money a loan. If you think the prez is speinding too much, cut the allocations back. Or leave them there, and endevour to kick this guy out.

[Kirnwaffen]

Well, the vote means nothing, but it's symbolism is just plain disgusting. I can't really lay any blame on the administration in this instance. This is essentially the Senate punishing the Iraqi people for the fact that they didn't have enough balls to call the adminisitration on its blatantly rediculous figures in the first place. The truth is that the whole premise of Iraq paying its own reconstruction costs is altogether nonsensical. It seems rather obvious to me that, if you invade a sovereign nation, you bear the responsibility for the aftermath.