Why liberals are not hyprocrits - by Ann Coulter

[oedo]

so we can say now, George W. is a philander, a draft dodger and a liar and just admitting it would make him a liberal?

no.

[Whaleboy]

Ah, but elijah, she is agreeing with you that liberals have no morals, as you have several times argues here.

Liberals have morals, as do all humans, but we (relativists) recognise their subjectivity and thus logical invalidity in a context in which they are not objective. Others may believe theirs extend to another context and that it is wholly "good" and another is "evil" etc, which I find frankly rather simple minded.

[Kropotkin]

Very amusing quite you've got there.

I feel the urge to repeat a statement I made a while back. While editorials are supposed to give a point of view, not to be objective, there's a limit to how stupid those editorials should be. It's just crap. It shouldn't be allowed into a school paper. In the western world were a large proportion has the change to get a higher education it's getting more and more obvious that they are not getting much smarter with it.

[Stefu]

Incidentally, everybody, it's spelled 'hypocrite'.

[uh Clem]

Che did not argue the point Ann made

What point? When has AC ever made an intellectually coherent argument? The intellectual content of all this cheesy drag queen's works could be summarized as, "The people I don't like are all poo-poo heads, so there!"

[Whaleboy]

Elijah, Che did not argue the point Ann made, but simply defamed her by calling her a moron.

And Che's attempt at humour is somehow representative of liberalism... how exactly?

[Agathon]

Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
Ann Coulter would do well to learn more fo the virtue of charity.

She might as well - I mean, she's got chastity down - who'd go to bed with that?

[Whaleboy]

@uh Clem

EDIT: and Agathon

[chequita guevara]

Originally posted by Ned
A liberal's only defense to truth: the smear!

I'm not a liberal and that's awful funny comming from a man who defends the author of Slander and Treason.

[mrmitchell]

Ann Coulter is the most insane person I've ever heard of that did not use religion to back up their insanity (which excludes Falwell, Robertson, etc).

[CygnusZ]

Re: Why liberals are not hyprocrites - by Ann Coulter

Originally posted by Ned
Is this a profound insight? Or is there another reason why philadering, draft dodging, lying, weasingly, appeasing liberals are not hypocrites?

Just as much as philadering, draft dodging, lying, weasingly, appeasing conservatives are hypocrites. If you ever come down here to DC I'll show you a man who lives in a BIG WHITE HOUSE that fits your description pretty well.

[Sandman]

By openly admitting to being philanderers, draft dodgers, liars, weasels and cowards, liberals avoid ever being hypocrites.

Like when? Coulter's only skill appears to be producing substantial amounts of waffle based on ad hominems.

Thank god we don't have the same vile celebrity columnists in Britain.

[Japher]

Incidentally, everybody, it's spelled 'hypocrite'.

Ok, Mr. ESL spelling nazi... "English" is not an exact language and is subject to bastardization on a message board without spell check..

I, on the other hand, spell everything correctely

[MrFun]

Hypocrisy is found among people of all political/social ideologies -- whether you're liberal, conservative, or whatever.

Why can't people grasp that simple concept??

[Whaleboy]

But there is no one ideology that is inherently hypocritical or populated entirely by hypocrites.