(Well, I, for one, will be glad to get the Man in the High Castle off my sig. Worst. Discussion. Ever.)
We’re going to open the discussion up to all 6 books, no spoilers, so please: DEAL WITH IT. Otherwise, there is likely no way in Hell that I’ll ever scratch up a voluntary discussion on the merits of Children of Dune for the rest of my life.
*JohnT dies*
I’m sure everybody has read the first book, probably the second book (possibly the most boring and depressing sequel in science fiction up to that time), and you probably gave up Dune sometime during books 3-5, picked it up again a few years later determined to plow through it (including Chapterhouse, and having done so then promptly forgot all that weird crap about the Honored Matres and the Scattering, remembering only the bizarre sex scene between Duncan and that HM who then became the BG’s reverend mother in the final novel, after the death of Darwi Odrade. Or maybe not - but that's how I read the books, and I'm willing to wager that a couple of you did it the same way.
Ok, the 6 books in the Dune Chronicles are as follows:
Dune
Dune Messiah Originally part of the first book, split off into its own separate novel to make the first book more upbeat and clearcut.
Children of Dune
God: Emperor of Dune
Heretics of Dune
Chapterhouse: Dune
Those abortions co-written by Herbert’s son and Brian Anderson are not up for discussion here – unless the discussion is a one-sided denunciation of their hacking and pillaging of the Dune tradition and their complete lack of awareness regarding the source material.
*A-hem!*data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c1fc/8c1fc132a950cf4ed288b5c731928b5daee16150" alt="Cute...."
Dune is a lot of things to a lot of people, and for a lot of us who read it first from the ages of 10-16, it was our first introduction into the political minds of adults, people whose every move is calculated, every thought measured, their reactions appraised, tested, and re-appraised. People just do not do stuff in Dune with disregard of how other people will react, sometimes I wonder with all the infighting and back-biting how anything of consequence ever gets decided.
Nuances in the curve of a lip, the stance of a potential enemy are pervasive in Dune – more than any other author I’ve read in science fiction, Herbert pays very careful attention to body language and the messages conveyed by such. Re-read the passage where Jessica sends for Chani to revive Paul after Maud’Dib drank the Water of Life: the tension raised not by the words or the situation but by the rigid adherence to formality by Chani, and the physical and vocal tensions this adherence creates within her (conveyed via Jessica's internal reactions to Chani's body language).
Another thing I like about Dune is that Frank Herbert really lets his personality and intellect shine in these novels – he uses the Dune books to tell us his thoughts on Messiah-hood, prescience, environmentalism, religion, politics, etc. Usually an author won’t be so open in their novels, ensuring that plotting and pace take precedence over discourse and background. Herbert is the opposite – he has no problems stopping the action for a discourse/monologue on tradition as he does in Children, in the two chapters where Leto and Stilgar go for their walk. When I read Dune I’m actually aware that not only is Herbert telling us a story, he is also telling us quite a bit about himself and what he thinks is important and interesting.
If I don’t look too closely I buy the technology – it must’ve been quite a challenge to come up with a believeable interstellar feudal society dominated by swordsmen and hand-to-hand combat w/o projectile weapons but with a restrictive and expensive means of space travel. Herbert came up with a pretty decent back-story to explain the lack of computers and the general technological retardation that we wouldn’t expect in such a vast society, a back-story that was made much clearer with the publication of the awesome Dune Encyclopedia. However, I do think that after a few thousand years IX would’ve come up with a mechanical means of interstellar travel and that the Tleilaxu would’ve been able to come up with a spice substitute – the chemical make up can’t be THAT hard to break down.
I’ve got a lot more to say about these novels, but this is enough for now.
Favorite character: Stilgar, of course, followed by Leto II.
Least favorite character: Yueh, Siona in God: Emperor.
Favorite book: Children of Dune, followed by Dune
Least favorite book: Dune Messiah by a WIDE margin after Heretics of Dune.
We’re going to open the discussion up to all 6 books, no spoilers, so please: DEAL WITH IT. Otherwise, there is likely no way in Hell that I’ll ever scratch up a voluntary discussion on the merits of Children of Dune for the rest of my life.
*JohnT dies*
I’m sure everybody has read the first book, probably the second book (possibly the most boring and depressing sequel in science fiction up to that time), and you probably gave up Dune sometime during books 3-5, picked it up again a few years later determined to plow through it (including Chapterhouse, and having done so then promptly forgot all that weird crap about the Honored Matres and the Scattering, remembering only the bizarre sex scene between Duncan and that HM who then became the BG’s reverend mother in the final novel, after the death of Darwi Odrade. Or maybe not - but that's how I read the books, and I'm willing to wager that a couple of you did it the same way.
Ok, the 6 books in the Dune Chronicles are as follows:
Dune
Dune Messiah Originally part of the first book, split off into its own separate novel to make the first book more upbeat and clearcut.
Children of Dune
God: Emperor of Dune
Heretics of Dune
Chapterhouse: Dune
Those abortions co-written by Herbert’s son and Brian Anderson are not up for discussion here – unless the discussion is a one-sided denunciation of their hacking and pillaging of the Dune tradition and their complete lack of awareness regarding the source material.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b50ff/b50ff94c58989a77db424443297602082ffa2f33" alt="Mad"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97f7e/97f7e3ae9752c6df3cc6965f6828d182c6039fe2" alt="rant"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b50ff/b50ff94c58989a77db424443297602082ffa2f33" alt="Mad"
*A-hem!*
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c1fc/8c1fc132a950cf4ed288b5c731928b5daee16150" alt="Cute...."
Dune is a lot of things to a lot of people, and for a lot of us who read it first from the ages of 10-16, it was our first introduction into the political minds of adults, people whose every move is calculated, every thought measured, their reactions appraised, tested, and re-appraised. People just do not do stuff in Dune with disregard of how other people will react, sometimes I wonder with all the infighting and back-biting how anything of consequence ever gets decided.
Nuances in the curve of a lip, the stance of a potential enemy are pervasive in Dune – more than any other author I’ve read in science fiction, Herbert pays very careful attention to body language and the messages conveyed by such. Re-read the passage where Jessica sends for Chani to revive Paul after Maud’Dib drank the Water of Life: the tension raised not by the words or the situation but by the rigid adherence to formality by Chani, and the physical and vocal tensions this adherence creates within her (conveyed via Jessica's internal reactions to Chani's body language).
Another thing I like about Dune is that Frank Herbert really lets his personality and intellect shine in these novels – he uses the Dune books to tell us his thoughts on Messiah-hood, prescience, environmentalism, religion, politics, etc. Usually an author won’t be so open in their novels, ensuring that plotting and pace take precedence over discourse and background. Herbert is the opposite – he has no problems stopping the action for a discourse/monologue on tradition as he does in Children, in the two chapters where Leto and Stilgar go for their walk. When I read Dune I’m actually aware that not only is Herbert telling us a story, he is also telling us quite a bit about himself and what he thinks is important and interesting.
If I don’t look too closely I buy the technology – it must’ve been quite a challenge to come up with a believeable interstellar feudal society dominated by swordsmen and hand-to-hand combat w/o projectile weapons but with a restrictive and expensive means of space travel. Herbert came up with a pretty decent back-story to explain the lack of computers and the general technological retardation that we wouldn’t expect in such a vast society, a back-story that was made much clearer with the publication of the awesome Dune Encyclopedia. However, I do think that after a few thousand years IX would’ve come up with a mechanical means of interstellar travel and that the Tleilaxu would’ve been able to come up with a spice substitute – the chemical make up can’t be THAT hard to break down.
I’ve got a lot more to say about these novels, but this is enough for now.
Favorite character: Stilgar, of course, followed by Leto II.
Least favorite character: Yueh, Siona in God: Emperor.
Favorite book: Children of Dune, followed by Dune
Least favorite book: Dune Messiah by a WIDE margin after Heretics of Dune.
Comment