Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Your culture sucks, mine is better

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Q Cubed
    as for the great leap forward? i doubt it would have ever occured had there been no opium wars, no introduction of communism into east asia, and no crazed drive to modernize and catch up to the west.
    They wouldn't have had to have a man-made famine. China had a natural famine every other year. Say what you will about the murderous stupidity of the Chinese Revolution, it saved more lives than it took, simply by abolishing China's bi-yearly natural famines.
    Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

    Comment


    • #62
      Re: Your culture sucks, mine is better

      Originally posted by Vesayen
      Your culture sucks, mine is better
      Attached Files
      Eventis is the only refuge of the spammer. Join us now.
      Long live teh paranoia smiley!

      Comment


      • #63
        Interesting. Did you draw it on your computer or scan it in?
        (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
        (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
        (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

        Comment


        • #64
          Re: Re: Your culture sucks, mine is better

          Originally posted by Comrade Tassadar
          Looks like a Brancusi. Actually, looks like Brancusi's portrait of James Joyce.
          Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

          ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

          Comment


          • #65

            Yes, but by imperialism, most social scientists mean a very specific form of imperialism, capitalist imperialism, which conquered the world slightly over 100 years ago. No other imperialism ever came close, and they aren't existant today, so there's really no point in struggling against them.

            'Capitalist Empirialism' is nonsence. It wasn't the emperialism of capitalism, it was European Emperialism, envigorated by a new economical engine, capitalism, to replace the elderly mercantilism. There is a very much strong connection between Spain's new world conquests, and Victorian world-wide expansion. It was the same emperialism of old, AS ALWAYS backed by economical incentives, but capitalism wasn't special at that, either.


            by Sandman:
            Sorry, but this doesn't make much sense. You still seem to be labouring under the belief that my quote is somehow related to morality. And what is 'this element of liberalism' you're talking about?

            That's my problem, too, but sort of backwards. How does reality reflect on morality, and vice versa?
            urgh.NSFW

            Comment


            • #66
              the lowermost group of symbols.. rather phallic... the rest: irritating.

              "authority: question"

              Comment


              • #67
                Re: Your culture sucks, mine is better

                Originally posted by Vesayen
                I just went to my first relative anthropology class.....
                Suggest you complete the course before condemning the subject. Because I binned a lot of subjects in my teens and am having to re-examine them in my 30's.

                Originally posted by Vesayen
                because the new generation decides it would rather work a cash register at Sears then run around the rain forest half naked and die of typhoid at the ripe old age of 35.........
                You are saying a rain forest dweller is literate and numerate enough to operate a cash register???

                (Thnks - barcodes - hmmm...)

                Maybe. I doubt it though. For one thing, working at a checkout is more physically demanding than living in the rain forest. Also, what prolongs the life expectancy isn't working in a "modern" economy, it's the health care that takes care of premature death.

                I've cut this post way short - let others have their rant.
                Some cry `Allah O Akbar` in the street. And some carry Allah in their heart.
                "The CIA does nothing, says nothing, allows nothing, unless its own interests are served. They are the biggest assembly of liars and theives this country ever put under one roof and they are an abomination" Deputy COS (Intel) US Army 1981-84

                Comment


                • #68
                  erm without working you won't have the medicine.
                  urgh.NSFW

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    With clean water and hygienic living conditions you won't die of typhoid.

                    You think there aren't any old nomads?
                    Some cry `Allah O Akbar` in the street. And some carry Allah in their heart.
                    "The CIA does nothing, says nothing, allows nothing, unless its own interests are served. They are the biggest assembly of liars and theives this country ever put under one roof and they are an abomination" Deputy COS (Intel) US Army 1981-84

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      it depends.

                      bump.
                      urgh.NSFW

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Aren't there specialist restaurants serving raw, live octopus in Korea?

                        forgot about those. hm.. they also have it as a side dish.

                        Besides which, salmon is very tasty 'uncooked'- as Scots and Swedes could also tell you.

                        lachs? i suppose.

                        Beef carpaccio too, and steak tartare....

                        never had that, but we've established that westerners are barbarians.

                        B♭3

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Che
                          Say what you will about the murderous stupidity of the Chinese Revolution, it saved more lives than it took, simply by abolishing China's bi-yearly natural famines.

                          Yeah, maybe in some Communist-apologists' dreams ...

                          The wholly man-made famine which resulted from the wildly irresponsible policies of the CCP during the Great Leap resulted in the largest famine in the history of man. The typical famines China routinely experienced were smaller by orders of magnitude.
                          Official Homepage of the HiRes Graphics Patch for Civ2

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Comrade Tassadar has attached this image:
                            Looks like Picaso's "Man masterbating while playing Asteroids"
                            Monkey!!!

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              'Capitalist Empirialism' is nonsence. It wasn't the emperialism of capitalism, it was European Emperialism, envigorated by a new economical engine, capitalism, to replace the elderly mercantilism. There is a very much strong connection between Spain's new world conquests, and Victorian world-wide expansion. It was the same emperialism of old, AS ALWAYS backed by economical incentives, but capitalism wasn't special at that, either.
                              Spanish imperialism was primarily about plundering precious natural resources, particularly gold and silver. Victorian (capitalist) imperialism was fundamentally different, plundering markets and destroying competition. Which is definitely a more recent phenomenon.

                              Yeah, maybe in some Communist-apologists' dreams ...

                              The wholly man-made famine which resulted from the wildly irresponsible policies of the CCP during the Great Leap resulted in the largest famine in the history of man. The typical famines China routinely experienced were smaller by orders of magnitude.
                              But the GLF resulted in far less casualties since 1948 than what happened to capitalist India (before 1948, the countries had comparable casualties from famines). Every several years, India's famines amount to the single massive famine China had since the commies took over.

                              I'm not a fan of the CCP, but they were better than the Nationalists.
                              "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
                              -Bokonon

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Bah. It's supposed to look like Korean
                                Eventis is the only refuge of the spammer. Join us now.
                                Long live teh paranoia smiley!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X