Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Going too far? Banning peanut butter sandwiches because of ONE childs allergy...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Going too far? Banning peanut butter sandwiches because of ONE childs allergy...

    (I know, think, where Che will stand on this one. )

    One 5-year-old's allergy leads to class peanut ban
    Dozens of parents at PTA meeting question lunch searches, nurse


    An East Bay elementary school's ban on peanut butter sandwiches and other nut products in its kindergarten classes has some parents questioning whether school district administrators overreacted to concerns for one allergic child.

    At the center of the storm is a 5-year-old boy enrolled at Valle Verde Elementary School in Walnut Creek. He suffers from "peanut and tree nut" allergies that his mother says are life-threatening.

    As a result, school officials have taken extraordinary steps in Pod C, a group of kindergarten classrooms at Valle Verde that share a common central area.

    The parents of other kindergarten students were informed of the situation in a letter from school officials, who decreed that "all kindergarten students will begin the day by washing hands with soap and water . . . supervised by classroom staff."

    Then they learned that a licensed vocational nurse has been hired to monitor the student. On the first day of school, parents said, their kids' backpacks and lunch boxes were searched for peanut butter sandwiches and such.

    District spokeswoman Sue Berg acknowledged that "the principal said the first day they did have to confiscate or set aside" some food.

    That was enough to get the petitions out and by Monday night's PTA meeting more than 70 people had signed their names to a demand that school officials explain what steps have been taken and why they were necessary.

    The PTA session, which drew between 150 and 200 people and was the largest turnout PTA President Kim Moore had ever seen, produced few answers from school officials who declined to discuss specifics.

    Many of those attending questioned why the boy couldn't be schooled at home if his condition is so severe.

    "My son is allergic to dust mites," said one woman. "Can we get rid of dust mites on campus?"

    The allergic boy's mother, Leora Cope, didn't speak at the meeting and later flatly rejected suggestions from others in the audience that the school was overreacting to her son's condition.

    "My child's allergies are life-threatening," she said. "If he contacts peanut oil, it could threaten his life. This is a lot different than dust mites."

    She said with the measures taken by the school, her son faces no threat. "This is nothing new. This is a situation of parents who are not informed." ( JT )

    For years, schools across the nation have struggled with how to balance the needs of severely allergic child -- like the one in Walnut Creek -- with the desires of children who love peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. But the question remains: How far should schools, airlines and other institutions go to accommodate people with severe allergies?

    Moore, the PTA president, said she initially questioned the steps taken by the Valle Verde officials, but after researching allergies on the Internet came to agree with their position.

    "Allergies vary on a spectrum," she said. "Here we have a child who reacts very violently to the touch of even peanut oil. What we are talking about is life or death."

    Although the allergic reaction to peanuts is not rare, and the 5-year-old is not the first student with it to attend the school, experts say the severity of the reaction can vary.

    Walnut Creek allergist and immunologist Dr. Nancy Mozelsio earlier in the day told The Chronicle that it is not unusual for schools to create a "nut- free zone" for allergic students. Children are asked not to bring nut products to class, and even items like coconut sunblock are checked.

    "That works quite well," says Mozelsio. "I would say that in most cases having the child in a nut-free zone, being careful not to share food, and not eating anything not packed by mom or dad should be fine."

    It's possible that this 5-year-old's reactions might be so severe as to be a threat, but that would be very unusual, Mozelsio said.

    "I would say having someone (a nurse) go around with that person and searching lunch boxes is a bit excessive, in my opinion," she said. "There have been a couple of cases written up of reactions from people who experienced a reaction just touching or breathing peanut dust. But I think there's a little hysteria involved. That's not typical of what we see."

    Alicia McCormack, chair of the school safety committee and first vice president of the Valle Verde PTA, worries that the salary for the nurse is the reason that the school, financially strapped like most in the state, has lost an instructional assistant.

    "We made a real effort not to let the budget cuts affect our school," McCormack said. "But all I know is we are down one IA and up a nurse."

    Valle Verde Principal Carolyn Kreuscher said hiring the nurse would not siphon funds away from other school programs.

    Some parents say that rather than impose restrictions and search lunches, the matter could have been handled with less draconian measures.

    "Look," says Kathryn Stewart, a clinical psychologist who works with special education high school students, "my son (now 15) is allergic to peanuts and an alumni of Valle Verde. This kind of nonsense makes me crazy.

    "By kindergarten, and certainly by first grade, my son was able to say, 'What is in that?' " she said. "Searching a lunch box is insane. This goes to personal responsibility not changing the rest of the world to fit you."


    Precisely, Kathryn. What more can you say than that?

    44
    Yes, the kid deserves the full right to attend school as everybody else.
    34.09%
    15
    No. That right does not extend to imposing dietary restrictions on the OTHER kids.
    52.27%
    23
    Damn good thing he ain't allergic to Bananas!
    13.64%
    6

  • #2
    Re: Going too far? Banning peanut butter sandwiches because of ONE childs allergy...

    Originally posted by JohnT
    (I know, think, where Che will stand on this one. )
    You mean commies have a particular position in regards to peanut butter and allergies?
    A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

    Comment


    • #3
      Are the kid and teachers that stupid?
      I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
      For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

      Comment


      • #4
        I wish we could have a "nut-free" zone here...
        I'm consitently stupid- Japher
        I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- Ned

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Re: Going too far? Banning peanut butter sandwiches because of ONE childs allergy...

          Originally posted by MrFun


          You mean commies have a particular position in regards to peanut butter and allergies?
          We've discussed this (peanut allergy) issue before as a side argument in another thread a year or so ago.

          Comment


          • #6
            Oh, and Che likes peanuts. So don't be too secure in your assumptions.
            I'm consitently stupid- Japher
            I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- Ned

            Comment


            • #7
              This has always been common practice in the schools I've gone to. Peanut allergies can be really severe, and aside from a 6 year old not necisarily being able to find out what's in the food given to him by friends, just touching it can cause a reaction.
              Rethink Refuse Reduce Reuse

              Do It Ourselves

              Comment


              • #8
                Utter nonsense. Why should your allergy require that other people in a public school change their dietary habits? If you are that bad with allergies don't send your kid to a public school.
                “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.â€
                - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                Comment


                • #9
                  They should make him play Russian roulette with a packet of Revells. That's what we did at my school.
                  Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
                  Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
                  We've got both kinds

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Damned heartless americans. This wasn't a problem where I lived - Parents excepted the fact that a kid could die from allergies and gave up their childrens precious peanut butter cookies for his sake.
                    Rethink Refuse Reduce Reuse

                    Do It Ourselves

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by DinoDoc
                      Are the kid and teachers that stupid?
                      Own goal! Of course they are.
                      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        If you want to ban anything someone could be allergic too that would be a loooong list....
                        If its no fun why do it? Dance like noone is watching...

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Oerdin
                          Own goal! Of course they are.
                          Point taken.
                          I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                          For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Osweld
                            Damned heartless americans. This wasn't a problem where I lived - Parents excepted the fact that a kid could die from allergies and gave up their childrens precious peanut butter cookies for his sake.
                            Glad you could use my thread for yet another bigoted comment.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I'm totally with Osweld on this one (if you delete the phrase "heartless americans" from his post, that is).

                              I don't think that access to peanut butter sandwiches is a fundmental human right. Are the other kids so attached to their sandwich fillings that they would place the life of one of their peers at risk?

                              Besides, they're ****ing digusting.
                              If I'm posting here then Counterglow must be down.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X